[GH-ISSUE #2028] Route via FQDN #4076

Closed
opened 2026-08-05 00:55:46 -04:00 by saavagebueno · 5 comments
Owner

Originally created by @ez1976 on GitHub (May 21, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/2028

Hello.
since the route entries are done via network range, i was wondering if it is possible to add also via FQDN.
for example i need to route cloudflare ip via netbird (since we have sites that allow only access from our Office IP).
so either add all the ip of cloudflare + WARP (which is a very very long list),
or maybe can use the internal DNS of netbird and have it populate to the clients that
if "netbird client" (AKA laptop) accesses cloudflare FQDN -> resolves to a site that is hosted on cloudflare -> route via netbird

its a long shot since no one can do that on traditional firewalls or SSL VPN but though i would ask

Originally created by @ez1976 on GitHub (May 21, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/2028 Hello. since the route entries are done via network range, i was wondering if it is possible to add also via FQDN. for example i need to route cloudflare ip via netbird (since we have sites that allow only access from our Office IP). so either add all the ip of cloudflare + WARP (which is a very very long list), or maybe can use the internal DNS of netbird and have it populate to the clients that if "netbird client" (AKA laptop) accesses cloudflare FQDN -> resolves to a site that is hosted on cloudflare -> route via netbird its a long shot since no one can do that on traditional firewalls or SSL VPN but though i would ask
saavagebueno added the feature-request label 2026-08-05 00:55:46 -04:00
Author
Owner

@taylorwilsdon commented on GitHub (May 22, 2024):

I believe this is already in review here!
https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/pull/1943

<!-- gh-comment-id:2124796926 --> @taylorwilsdon commented on GitHub (May 22, 2024): I believe this is already in review here! https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/pull/1943
Author
Owner

@ez1976 commented on GitHub (May 24, 2024):

Hi
thanks for your reply.
what i mean is that we have websites that are using amazon edge via
cloudfront.
according to these , they have about 9280 different IP and ranges.
if i could just add our website FQDN and then netbird will be able to route
that website via netbird instead of adding 9200 routes to netbird.
thanks

https://ip-ranges.amazonaws.com/ip-ranges.json

Message ID: @.***>

<!-- gh-comment-id:2130080835 --> @ez1976 commented on GitHub (May 24, 2024): Hi thanks for your reply. what i mean is that we have websites that are using amazon edge via cloudfront. according to these , they have about 9280 different IP and ranges. if i could just add our website FQDN and then netbird will be able to route that website via netbird instead of adding 9200 routes to netbird. thanks https://ip-ranges.amazonaws.com/ip-ranges.json > Message ID: ***@***.***> >
Author
Owner

@nazarewk commented on GitHub (Apr 23, 2025):

I believe the new Networks > Resources do support this use case: they add a result of resolving the specific domain to the routing table automatically.

<!-- gh-comment-id:2824590994 --> @nazarewk commented on GitHub (Apr 23, 2025): I believe the new Networks > Resources do support this use case: they add a result of resolving the specific domain to the routing table automatically.
Author
Owner

@ez1976 commented on GitHub (Apr 24, 2025):

Yes since netbird died FQDN routing this can be closed

On Wed, Apr 23, 2025, 15:54 Krzysztof Nazarewski (kdn) <
@.***> wrote:

nazarewk left a comment (netbirdio/netbird#2028)
https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/2028#issuecomment-2824590994

I believe the new Networks > Resources do support this use case: they add
a result of resolving the specific domain to the routing table
automatically.


Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/2028#issuecomment-2824590994,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AANTDDZ4MEJZBGE3PZQKGDT226STPAVCNFSM6AAAAAB3WSY4OKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDQMRUGU4TAOJZGQ
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
@.***>

<!-- gh-comment-id:2829212326 --> @ez1976 commented on GitHub (Apr 24, 2025): Yes since netbird died FQDN routing this can be closed On Wed, Apr 23, 2025, 15:54 Krzysztof Nazarewski (kdn) < ***@***.***> wrote: > *nazarewk* left a comment (netbirdio/netbird#2028) > <https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/2028#issuecomment-2824590994> > > I believe the new Networks > Resources do support this use case: they add > a result of resolving the specific domain to the routing table > automatically. > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/2028#issuecomment-2824590994>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AANTDDZ4MEJZBGE3PZQKGDT226STPAVCNFSM6AAAAAB3WSY4OKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDQMRUGU4TAOJZGQ> > . > You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: > ***@***.***> >
Author
Owner

@jnfrati commented on GitHub (May 7, 2026):

Closing this! If the current behavior of networks still don't match what you were expecting feel free to open a new feature request or an issue and we'll take a look!

<!-- gh-comment-id:4396428302 --> @jnfrati commented on GitHub (May 7, 2026): Closing this! If the current behavior of networks still don't match what you were expecting feel free to open a new [feature request or an issue](https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/discussions/new/choose) and we'll take a look!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label feature-request
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: DYNR/netbird#4076