[GH-ISSUE #4019] Auto update for desktop clients #7872

Closed
opened 2026-08-05 01:14:58 -04:00 by saavagebueno · 6 comments
Owner

Originally created by @PeakeIT on GitHub (Jun 20, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/4019

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I want to be able to deploy this to clients however my hesitation is that I wont have a dependable way to update end client devices.

Describe the solution you'd like
Some method to either trigger an update remotely or set the device to automatically update when a new release comes out.

Describe alternatives you've considered
I've considered using Winget or UniGet but they don't seem to reliably update the netbird client.

Additional context
Nothing additional.

Originally created by @PeakeIT on GitHub (Jun 20, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/4019 **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** I want to be able to deploy this to clients however my hesitation is that I wont have a dependable way to update end client devices. **Describe the solution you'd like** Some method to either trigger an update remotely or set the device to automatically update when a new release comes out. **Describe alternatives you've considered** I've considered using Winget or UniGet but they don't seem to reliably update the netbird client. **Additional context** Nothing additional.
saavagebueno added the feature-request label 2026-08-05 01:14:58 -04:00
Author
Owner

@sahps commented on GitHub (Jun 26, 2025):

I have the same issue, not just with Netbird but lots of apps that require admin-rights to update.

Here is my attempt to resolve this for Netbird, feel free to use.

https://gist.github.com/sahps/37fcfb1edc5241a879a0a7df4275cace

<!-- gh-comment-id:3008054231 --> @sahps commented on GitHub (Jun 26, 2025): I have the same issue, not just with Netbird but lots of apps that require admin-rights to update. Here is my attempt to resolve this for Netbird, feel free to use. https://gist.github.com/sahps/37fcfb1edc5241a879a0a7df4275cace
Author
Owner

@HammyHavoc commented on GitHub (Jul 3, 2025):

Would publishing via the Microsoft Store be an option for Windows users? Seeing more and more FOSS available officially via it.

I also see plenty of peer machines running old versions of NetBird frequently as users generally don't update the client.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3032616691 --> @HammyHavoc commented on GitHub (Jul 3, 2025): Would publishing via the Microsoft Store be an option for Windows users? Seeing more and more FOSS available officially via it. I also see plenty of peer machines running old versions of NetBird frequently as users generally don't update the client.
Author
Owner

@xihefeng commented on GitHub (Jul 30, 2025):

Would publishing via the Microsoft Store be an option for Windows users? Seeing more and more FOSS available officially via it.

I also see plenty of peer machines running old versions of NetBird frequently as users generally don't update the client.

In many Windows systems—such as Windows Server—or when users prefer not to rely on the Microsoft Store, having automated updates would save a great deal of unnecessary manual effort. This is a highly important feature that we are eagerly looking forward to.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3138265089 --> @xihefeng commented on GitHub (Jul 30, 2025): > Would publishing via the Microsoft Store be an option for Windows users? Seeing more and more FOSS available officially via it. > > I also see plenty of peer machines running old versions of NetBird frequently as users generally don't update the client. In many Windows systems—such as Windows Server—or when users prefer not to rely on the Microsoft Store, having automated updates would save a great deal of unnecessary manual effort. This is a highly important feature that we are eagerly looking forward to.
Author
Owner

@HammyHavoc commented on GitHub (Jul 30, 2025):

Would publishing via the Microsoft Store be an option for Windows users? Seeing more and more FOSS available officially via it.

I also see plenty of peer machines running old versions of NetBird frequently as users generally don't update the client.

In many Windows systems—such as Windows Server—or when users prefer not to rely on the Microsoft Store, having automated updates would save a great deal of unnecessary manual effort. This is a highly important feature that we are eagerly looking forward to.

You are presenting it like a false dichotomy when every other FOSS project just treats it like any other download mirror.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3138268964 --> @HammyHavoc commented on GitHub (Jul 30, 2025): > > Would publishing via the Microsoft Store be an option for Windows users? Seeing more and more FOSS available officially via it. > > > > I also see plenty of peer machines running old versions of NetBird frequently as users generally don't update the client. > > In many Windows systems—such as Windows Server—or when users prefer not to rely on the Microsoft Store, having automated updates would save a great deal of unnecessary manual effort. This is a highly important feature that we are eagerly looking forward to. You are presenting it like a false dichotomy when every other FOSS project just treats it like any other download mirror.
Author
Owner

@xihefeng commented on GitHub (Jul 30, 2025):

Would publishing via the Microsoft Store be an option for Windows users? Seeing more and more FOSS available officially via it.
I also see plenty of peer machines running old versions of NetBird frequently as users generally don't update the client.

In many Windows systems—such as Windows Server—or when users prefer not to rely on the Microsoft Store, having automated updates would save a great deal of unnecessary manual effort. This is a highly important feature that we are eagerly looking forward to.

You are presenting it like a false dichotomy when every other FOSS project just treats it like any other download mirror.

Thanks for the clarification—I didn’t mean to frame it as an either-or choice. My main point is that automatic updates are what really matter; whether they come through an app-store build or a regular download mirror isn’t important to me. Ideally, we’d have both distribution options available so users can pick their preferred channel while still benefiting from seamless auto-updates.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3138410967 --> @xihefeng commented on GitHub (Jul 30, 2025): > > > Would publishing via the Microsoft Store be an option for Windows users? Seeing more and more FOSS available officially via it. > > > I also see plenty of peer machines running old versions of NetBird frequently as users generally don't update the client. > > > > > > In many Windows systems—such as Windows Server—or when users prefer not to rely on the Microsoft Store, having automated updates would save a great deal of unnecessary manual effort. This is a highly important feature that we are eagerly looking forward to. > > You are presenting it like a false dichotomy when every other FOSS project just treats it like any other download mirror. Thanks for the clarification—I didn’t mean to frame it as an either-or choice. My main point is that automatic updates are what really matter; whether they come through an app-store build or a regular download mirror isn’t important to me. Ideally, we’d have both distribution options available so users can pick their preferred channel while still benefiting from seamless auto-updates.
Author
Owner

@nazarewk commented on GitHub (Oct 22, 2025):

found by chance that there are multiple feature requests for this, I'll close it as a duplicate on behalf of the oldest one

<!-- gh-comment-id:3431084579 --> @nazarewk commented on GitHub (Oct 22, 2025): found by chance that there are multiple feature requests for this, I'll close it as a duplicate on behalf of the oldest one
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label feature-request
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: DYNR/netbird#7872