SVI/ProxmoxVE
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/community-scripts/ProxmoxVE.git synced 2026-07-03 04:32:27 -04:00
Code Issues 2.6k Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Transfer of original repo into this organization #10

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-11-20 04:42:30 -05:00 by saavagebueno · 3 comments
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 04:42:30 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @Neustradamus on GitHub (Nov 4, 2024).

Please verify that you have read and understood the guidelines.

yes

A clear and concise description of the issue.

@tteck: Why the original repository has not been moved into @community-scripts organization?

Can you do it?

What settings are you currently utilizing?

Default Settings

Which Linux distribution are you employing?

Alpine

If relevant, including screenshots or a code block can be helpful in clarifying the issue.

No response

Please provide detailed steps to reproduce the issue.

No response

Originally created by @Neustradamus on GitHub (Nov 4, 2024). ### Please verify that you have read and understood the guidelines. yes ### A clear and concise description of the issue. @tteck: Why the original repository has not been moved into @community-scripts organization? - https://github.com/tteck/Proxmox Can you do it? ### What settings are you currently utilizing? Default Settings ### Which Linux distribution are you employing? Alpine ### If relevant, including screenshots or a code block can be helpful in clarifying the issue. _No response_ ### Please provide detailed steps to reproduce the issue. _No response_
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 04:42:31 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@newzealandpaul commented on GitHub (Nov 4, 2024):

I am not sure the original reasoning, but please keep in mind tteck may not be able to answer questions. I don't think it matters going forward.

@newzealandpaul commented on GitHub (Nov 4, 2024): I am not sure the original reasoning, but please keep in mind tteck may not be able to answer questions. I don't think it matters going forward.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 04:42:32 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@MickLesk commented on GitHub (Nov 5, 2024):

tteck wants the original code to remain unprocessed. The original repo has therefore been archived.

@MickLesk commented on GitHub (Nov 5, 2024): tteck wants the original code to remain unprocessed. The original repo has therefore been archived.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 04:42:32 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Neustradamus commented on GitHub (Nov 5, 2024):

@MickLesk: It has not been solved, can you reopen?

I have already explained steps to @BramSuurdje :)

The goal is to do not lost the history, fork, star, etc. and there will have redirections.

  • 14.3k stars
  • 194 Watchers
  • 2.3k Forks
@Neustradamus commented on GitHub (Nov 5, 2024): @MickLesk: It has not been solved, can you reopen? I have already explained steps to @BramSuurdje :) The goal is to do not lost the history, fork, star, etc. and there will have redirections. - 14.3k stars - 194 Watchers - 2.3k Forks
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
🛑 Failure to comply with the guidelines
breaking change
bug
bug
bugfix
deferred
delete script
dependencies
enhancement
external
feature
github
help wanted
Implemented in VED waiting push to Main
in project pipeline
invalid
investigation
json
maintenance
new script
new script
nice to have
not a script issue
not planned
organization
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
refactor
rename script
security
update script
website
wontdo
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
saavagebueno
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SVI/ProxmoxVE#10
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?