SVI/ProxmoxVE
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/community-scripts/ProxmoxVE.git synced 2026-03-31 06:34:17 -04:00
Code Issues 2.6k Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Open Web UI script failing when downloading ollama.tgz #1993

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-11-20 05:21:24 -05:00 by saavagebueno · 9 comments
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:21:24 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @Fonzi03 on GitHub (Oct 2, 2025).

✅ Have you read and understood the above guidelines?

yes

📜 What is the name of the script you are using?

oben WebUI lxc

📂 What was the exact command used to execute the script?

bash -c "$(curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/community-scripts/ProxmoxVE/main/ct/openwebui.sh)"

⚙️ What settings are you using?

  • Default Settings
  • Advanced Settings

🖥️ Which Linux distribution are you using?

No response

📈 Which Proxmox version are you on?

debian

📝 Provide a clear and concise description of the issue.

install the script as custom just to adjust disk, cpu and ram. everything completes up until the ollama download.

Image

🔄 Steps to reproduce the issue.

install, wait, fail. Confirmed 3 times.

❌ Paste the full error output (if available).

Image

🖼️ Additional context (optional).

No response

Originally created by @Fonzi03 on GitHub (Oct 2, 2025). ### ✅ Have you read and understood the above guidelines? yes ### 📜 What is the name of the script you are using? oben WebUI lxc ### 📂 What was the exact command used to execute the script? bash -c "$(curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/community-scripts/ProxmoxVE/main/ct/openwebui.sh)" ### ⚙️ What settings are you using? - [ ] Default Settings - [x] Advanced Settings ### 🖥️ Which Linux distribution are you using? _No response_ ### 📈 Which Proxmox version are you on? debian ### 📝 Provide a clear and concise description of the issue. install the script as custom just to adjust disk, cpu and ram. everything completes up until the ollama download. <img width="2084" height="145" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ea0b992c-e001-4c05-b733-b397764e88a8" /> ### 🔄 Steps to reproduce the issue. install, wait, fail. Confirmed 3 times. ### ❌ Paste the full error output (if available). <img width="2084" height="145" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9d7b0071-462c-427d-9136-1bbeddc8687c" /> ### 🖼️ Additional context (optional). _No response_
saavagebueno added the not a script issue label 2025-11-20 05:21:24 -05:00
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:21:24 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@MickLesk commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2025):

Ollama is big, your Network to slow. We cant handle such Special things

@MickLesk commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2025): Ollama is big, your Network to slow. We cant handle such Special things
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:21:24 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Fonzi03 commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2025):

Why are you thinking my network is slow?

Ollama is big, your Network to slow. We cant handle such Special things

@Fonzi03 commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2025): Why are you thinking my network is slow? > Ollama is big, your Network to slow. We cant handle such Special things
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:21:24 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@MickLesk commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2025):

It Breaks at 3.8% with http Upstream Errors.

@MickLesk commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2025): It Breaks at 3.8% with http Upstream Errors.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:21:25 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Fonzi03 commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2025):

I will try again today and run a speed test from that unit but my down speed should be 800 and I have a non blocking backplane.

It Breaks at 3.8% with http Upstream Errors.

@Fonzi03 commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2025): I will try again today and run a speed test from that unit but my down speed should be 800 and I have a non blocking backplane. > It Breaks at 3.8% with http Upstream Errors.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:21:25 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Fonzi03 commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2025):

You were right my network was experiencing issues I was not aware of. Got that fixed with my provider and it worked. Sorry for the unnecessary bug.

@Fonzi03 commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2025): You were right my network was experiencing issues I was not aware of. Got that fixed with my provider and it worked. Sorry for the unnecessary bug.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:21:25 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@tremor021 commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2025):

I mean, the error was telling you that from the start... :)

@tremor021 commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2025): I mean, the error was telling you that from the start... :)
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:21:25 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Fonzi03 commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2025):

I mean, the error was telling you that from the start... :)

Please elaborate as I could not find info on the error codes and their meaning and from what I read it does not say the download could not complete due to slow speeds.

When checked my bandwidth for download was extremely low but that doesnt mean the download should fail just take a long time instead.

However this script was abandoning the download without enough details to understand why (at least IMHO).

Especially considering the target was reachable. which the only bit of info it says is it was not. I did verify from that instance that it could reach that url and it could.

@Fonzi03 commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2025): > I mean, the error was telling you that from the start... :) Please elaborate as I could not find info on the error codes and their meaning and from what I read it does not say the download could not complete due to slow speeds. When checked my bandwidth for download was extremely low but that doesnt mean the download should fail just take a long time instead. However this script was abandoning the download without enough details to understand why (at least IMHO). Especially considering the target was reachable. which the only bit of info it says is it was not. I did verify from that instance that it could reach that url and it could.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:21:25 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@tremor021 commented on GitHub (Oct 3, 2025):

HTTP/2 stream 1 was not closed cleanly: PROTOCOL_ERROR

its in your screenshots... protocol errors = network breakage
the fact that you can ping something doesn't mean your connection to the host is stable for downloads

@tremor021 commented on GitHub (Oct 3, 2025): `HTTP/2 stream 1 was not closed cleanly: PROTOCOL_ERROR` its in your screenshots... protocol errors = network breakage the fact that you can ping something doesn't mean your connection to the host is stable for downloads
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:21:25 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Fonzi03 commented on GitHub (Oct 6, 2025):

Again this info is not clear what caused the disconnect (host or client). I was able to cleanly download the file even with the bad connection speeds on another machine with no issues. So although my speed was suffering at the time the connection was technically good enough to download the file, just slowly.

HTTP/2 stream 1 was not closed cleanly: PROTOCOL_ERROR

its in your screenshots... protocol errors = network breakage
the fact that you can ping something doesn't mean your connection to the host is stable for downloads

@Fonzi03 commented on GitHub (Oct 6, 2025): Again this info is not clear what caused the disconnect (host or client). I was able to cleanly download the file even with the bad connection speeds on another machine with no issues. So although my speed was suffering at the time the connection was technically good enough to download the file, just slowly. > `HTTP/2 stream 1 was not closed cleanly: PROTOCOL_ERROR` > > its in your screenshots... protocol errors = network breakage > the fact that you can ping something doesn't mean your connection to the host is stable for downloads
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
🛑 Failure to comply with the guidelines
breaking change
bug
bug
bugfix
deferred
delete script
dependencies
enhancement
external
feature
github
help wanted
Implemented in VED waiting push to Main
in project pipeline
invalid
investigation
json
maintenance
new script
new script
nice to have
not a script issue
not planned
organization
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
refactor
rename script
security
update script
website
wontdo
No Label not a script issue
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
saavagebueno
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SVI/ProxmoxVE#1993
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?