Stuck at 2.0.1 #2288

Closed
opened 2025-11-20 05:26:50 -05:00 by saavagebueno · 8 comments
Owner

Originally created by @vascozorrinho on GitHub (Nov 10, 2025).

Have you read and understood the above guidelines?

yes

📜 What is the name of the script you are using?

Uptime Kuma

📂 What was the exact command used to execute the script?

bash -c "$(curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/community-scripts/ProxmoxVE/main/ct/uptimekuma.sh)"

⚙️ What settings are you using?

  • Default Settings
  • Advanced Settings

🖥️ Which Linux distribution are you using?

Debian 13

📈 Which Proxmox version are you on?

8.4.14

📝 Provide a clear and concise description of the issue.

I've installed this LCX container and the installed Uptime Kuma was 2.0.1.

I've tried to update to 2.0.2 running the update command or running the bash command again. In both cases i go Yes silent option. At the end of the execution is says the update to 2.0.2 is a success.

Even after rebooting the container the interface keeps showing I'm in the 2.0.1 version

🔄 Steps to reproduce the issue.

update

Paste the full error output (if available).

No error is displayed

🖼️ Additional context (optional).

No response

Originally created by @vascozorrinho on GitHub (Nov 10, 2025). ### ✅ Have you read and understood the above guidelines? yes ### 📜 What is the name of the script you are using? Uptime Kuma ### 📂 What was the exact command used to execute the script? bash -c "$(curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/community-scripts/ProxmoxVE/main/ct/uptimekuma.sh)" ### ⚙️ What settings are you using? - [ ] Default Settings - [x] Advanced Settings ### 🖥️ Which Linux distribution are you using? Debian 13 ### 📈 Which Proxmox version are you on? 8.4.14 ### 📝 Provide a clear and concise description of the issue. I've installed this LCX container and the installed Uptime Kuma was 2.0.1. I've tried to update to 2.0.2 running the update command or running the bash command again. In both cases i go Yes silent option. At the end of the execution is says the update to 2.0.2 is a success. Even after rebooting the container the interface keeps showing I'm in the 2.0.1 version ### 🔄 Steps to reproduce the issue. update ### ❌ Paste the full error output (if available). No error is displayed ### 🖼️ Additional context (optional). _No response_
saavagebueno added the not a script issuebug labels 2025-11-20 05:26:50 -05:00
Author
Owner

@MickLesk commented on GitHub (Nov 10, 2025):

its an upstream error, they dont have updated the version file. the tool do what it do. Its not an script issue.

If you really want to force it again, go to /root/.uptime-kuma and edit the file, then run update.

@MickLesk commented on GitHub (Nov 10, 2025): its an upstream error, they dont have updated the version file. the tool do what it do. Its not an script issue. If you really want to force it again, go to /root/.uptime-kuma and edit the file, then run update.
Author
Owner

@vascozorrinho commented on GitHub (Nov 10, 2025):

that file already says 2.0.2. what am i missing?

EDIT: changed it to 2.0.1 and run the update again. the update went through but GUI still says 2.0.1

@vascozorrinho commented on GitHub (Nov 10, 2025): that file already says 2.0.2. what am i missing? EDIT: changed it to 2.0.1 and run the update again. the update went through but GUI still says 2.0.1
Author
Owner

@michelroegl-brunner commented on GitHub (Nov 10, 2025):

As Mick mentioned, they did not update the File where the WebGui gets the Version from. What are we supposed to then?

@michelroegl-brunner commented on GitHub (Nov 10, 2025): As Mick mentioned, they did not update the File where the WebGui gets the Version from. What are we supposed to then?
Author
Owner

@vascozorrinho commented on GitHub (Nov 10, 2025):

Is that a question for me? IDK.. probably not much, but i thought there was a solution

"If you really want to force it again, go to /root/.uptime-kuma and edit the file, then run update."

Also, why does the script says it did the update?

@vascozorrinho commented on GitHub (Nov 10, 2025): Is that a question for me? IDK.. probably not much, but i thought there was a solution "If you really want to force it again, go to /root/.uptime-kuma and edit the file, then run update." Also, why does the script says it did the update?
Author
Owner

@MickLesk commented on GitHub (Nov 10, 2025):

..... What don't you understand about it being an upstream issue? That was just to force it so you could see that it's not the update's fault.

@MickLesk commented on GitHub (Nov 10, 2025): ..... What don't you understand about it being an upstream issue? That was just to force it so you could see that it's not the update's fault.
Author
Owner

@michelroegl-brunner commented on GitHub (Nov 10, 2025):

Is that a question for me? IDK.. probably not much, but i thought there was a solution

"If you really want to force it again, go to /root/.uptime-kuma and edit the file, then run update."

Also, why does the script says it did the update?

It sayes it updated becouse it dose. It is a File wich gets provide by uptime-kuma wich has the version in it. Adn this file simply has the wrong version written to it. that is why you see the old version. That is why we are telling you we can not do anything here.

@michelroegl-brunner commented on GitHub (Nov 10, 2025): > Is that a question for me? IDK.. probably not much, but i thought there was a solution > > "If you really want to force it again, go to /root/.uptime-kuma and edit the file, then run update." > > Also, why does the script says it did the update? It sayes it updated becouse it dose. It is a File wich gets provide by uptime-kuma wich has the version in it. Adn this file simply has the wrong version written to it. that is why you see the old version. That is why we are telling you we can not do anything here.
Author
Owner

@vascozorrinho commented on GitHub (Nov 10, 2025):

@MickLesk i just understood you were providing me a workaround.. no need to be salty about that

@vascozorrinho commented on GitHub (Nov 10, 2025): @MickLesk i just understood you were providing me a workaround.. no need to be salty about that
Author
Owner

@MickLesk commented on GitHub (Nov 10, 2025):

New Install
=>

Image

they dont have updated their file

@MickLesk commented on GitHub (Nov 10, 2025): New Install => <img width="399" height="246" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ecf6248d-8086-44f8-a532-60518443150e" /> they dont have updated their file
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SVI/ProxmoxVE#2288