SVI/netbird
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird.git synced 2026-07-27 16:32:34 -04:00
Code Issues 3.0k Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Assign Posture Check for a specific peer #1025

New Issue
Open
opened 2025-11-20 05:22:29 -05:00 by saavagebueno · 1 comment
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:22:29 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @papoe on GitHub (Jun 27, 2024).

Currently, it is only possible to assign a posture check to both peers in a policy configuration. For example, if you configure a "Process Posture Check," both peers need to run the same process. Therefore, you cannot set up a policy where, for example, Peer A runs a process and Peer B only sends sensor data to Peer A for this process.

There should be the possibility to assign posture checks to specific peers, instead of requiring both peers to fulfill the posture check.

Originally created by @papoe on GitHub (Jun 27, 2024). Currently, it is only possible to assign a posture check to both peers in a policy configuration. For example, if you configure a "Process Posture Check," both peers need to run the same process. Therefore, you cannot set up a policy where, for example, Peer A runs a process and Peer B only sends sensor data to Peer A for this process. There should be the possibility to assign posture checks to specific peers, instead of requiring both peers to fulfill the posture check.
saavagebueno added the feature-request label 2025-11-20 05:22:29 -05:00
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:22:30 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@bcmmbaga commented on GitHub (Jun 28, 2024):

Hello @papoe , Currently, the posture checks are only applied to the peers of the policy source group. We will update the docs and dashboard to make this clear.

For example, you could create a policy with peer B (as part of the source group) and peer A (as part of the destination group) and apply the posture check. This will only require peer B to fulfill the check requirement before connecting to peer A.

@bcmmbaga commented on GitHub (Jun 28, 2024): Hello @papoe , Currently, the posture checks are only applied to the peers of the policy source group. We will update the docs and dashboard to make this clear. For example, you could create a policy with peer B (as part of the source group) and peer A (as part of the destination group) and apply the posture check. This will only require peer B to fulfill the check requirement before connecting to peer A.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
2021 Q4
2022 Q1
2022 Q1
accessibility
acl
agent
agent
Android
Android
api
authentik
automation
azure
battery-usage
bug
cache
client
client-ui
cloud
cloud-only
cloudflare
community
compatibility
config-idp
config-issue
connection
contribution
coturn
cross-vpn
dashboard
data-usage
distribution
dns
docker
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
event-stream
feature-request
freebsd
getting-started
go
good first issue
gui
help wanted
home-assistant
idp
inconsistency
integration
integrations
ios
ipv6
jwt
k8s
keycloak
linux
login
macos
management-service
missing-docs
mobile
moved-internal
needs-review
netbird-ui
networking
new-platform
nginx
notification
okta
openwrt
packaging
peer-management
peer-management
peer-management
performance
postgres
posture-checks
psk
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
refactor
relay
release
rfc
routes
security
security-related
self-hosting
server
signal
sleep-issue
ssh
ssl
status
store
synology
system-compatibility-issue
test-suite
third-party-integration
triage
triage-needed
troubleshooting
UX
waiting-feedback
windows
wontfix
zitadel
No Label feature-request
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
saavagebueno
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SVI/netbird#1025
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?