SVI/netbird
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird.git synced 2026-06-12 10:22:25 -04:00
Code Issues 3.0k Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

FreeBSD: enable skipped routing tests #1128

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-11-20 05:24:29 -05:00 by saavagebueno · 12 comments
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:24:29 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @skillcoder on GitHub (Aug 4, 2024).

Describe the problem
Currently under FreeBSD some tests are skipped, which could lead to undetected bugs.
Specifically tests related to routing disabled with

			t.Skip("skipping ", testCase.name, " on freebsd")

Following tests affected TestAddRemoveRoutes, TestGetNextHop, TestRouting

To Reproduce

To find all affected tests - grep codebase by freebsd substring.

Expected behavior

We should not skip any tests.

Originally created by @skillcoder on GitHub (Aug 4, 2024). **Describe the problem** Currently under FreeBSD some tests are skipped, which could lead to undetected bugs. Specifically tests related to routing disabled with ``` t.Skip("skipping ", testCase.name, " on freebsd") ``` Following tests affected `TestAddRemoveRoutes`, `TestGetNextHop`, `TestRouting` **To Reproduce** To find all affected tests - grep codebase by `freebsd` substring. **Expected behavior** We should not skip any tests.
saavagebueno added the waiting-feedbackroutesfreebsd labels 2025-11-20 05:24:29 -05:00
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:24:29 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@skillcoder commented on GitHub (Aug 6, 2024):

TestRouting failed because can't cleanup route 10.0.0.0/8

  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=info msg="using userspace bind mode"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=info msg="create tun interface"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=info msg="assign addr 100.64.0.1 mask 0xffffff00 to utun100 interface"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=debug msg="adding Wireguard private key"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=debug msg="Route for 0.0.0.0: interface &{2 16384 lo0  up|loopback|multicast|running} nexthop 192.168.0.1, preferred source 192.168.0.1"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=debug msg="Failed to get route for ::: no route found for ::"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n add -inet 0.0.0.0/1 -interface utun100: add net 0.0.0.0: gateway utun100\n"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n add -inet 128.0.0.0/1 -interface utun100: add net 128.0.0.0: gateway utun100\n"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n add -inet6 ::/1 -interface utun100: add net ::/1: gateway utun100\n"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n add -inet6 8000::/1 -interface utun100: add net 8000::/1: gateway utun100\n"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="try to add route: 10.0.0.0/8, utun100"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="sleep 1000000000"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=warning msg="Skipping adding a new route for network 10.0.0.0/8 because it already exists"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="try to add route: 10.10.0.0/24, utun100"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=debug msg="Route for 0.0.0.0: interface &{2 16384 lo0  up|loopback|multicast|running} nexthop 192.168.0.1, preferred source 192.168.0.1"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=debug msg="Skipping adding a new route for gateway 192.168.0.1 because it is not in the network 10.10.0.0/24"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n add -inet 10.10.0.0/24 -interface utun100: add net 10.10.0.0: gateway utun100\n"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="try to add route: 127.0.10.0/24, utun100"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n add -inet 127.0.10.0/24 -interface utun100: add net 127.0.10.0: gateway utun100\n"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="try to add route: 172.16.0.0/12, utun100"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n add -inet 172.16.0.0/12 -interface utun100: add net 172.16.0.0: gateway utun100\n"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n delete -inet 172.16.0.0/12 -interface utun100: delete net 172.16.0.0: gateway utun100\n"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n delete -inet 127.0.10.0/24 -interface utun100: delete net 127.0.10.0: gateway utun100\n"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n delete -inet 10.10.0.0/24 -interface utun100: delete net 10.10.0.0: gateway utun100\n"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n delete -inet 10.0.0.0/8 -interface utun100: delete net 10.0.0.0: gateway utun100 fib 0: not in table\n"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n delete -inet 0.0.0.0/1 -interface utun100: delete net 0.0.0.0: gateway utun100\n"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n delete -inet 128.0.0.0/1 -interface utun100: delete net 128.0.0.0: gateway utun100\n"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n delete -inet6 ::/1 -interface utun100: delete net ::/1: gateway utun100\n"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n delete -inet6 8000::/1 -interface utun100: delete net 8000::/1: gateway utun100\n"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="accept unix /var/run/wireguard/utun100.sock: use of closed network connection"
  time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=error msg="failed to close uapi listener: bad file descriptor"
  --- FAIL: TestRouting (0.06s)
      --- FAIL: TestRouting/To_external_host_without_custom_dialer_via_vpn (0.06s)
          systemops_generic_test.go:368: 
              	Error Trace:	/home/runner/work/netbird/netbird/client/internal/routemanager/systemops/systemops_generic_test.go:368
              	            				/usr/local/go121/src/testing/testing.go:1169
              	            				/usr/local/go121/src/testing/testing.go:1347
              	            				/usr/local/go121/src/testing/testing.go:1589
              	Error:      	Received unexpected error:
              	            	failed to delete route for 10.0.0.0/8: route cmd retry failed: exit status 1
              	Test:       	TestRouting/To_external_host_without_custom_dialer_via_vpn
              	Messages:   	removeVPNRoute should not return err: 10.0.0.0/8 utun100
  FAIL
  FAIL	github.com/netbirdio/netbird/client/internal/routemanager/systemops	2.017s
  FAIL

But it strange, it can't add the route to utun100 since it already somehow appeared on lo0
I've spend 3h and did not find the source of this, probably I should setup remote debugger to be able to run tests under debugger on remote FreeBSD machine. With my current setup it is too time consuming.

@skillcoder commented on GitHub (Aug 6, 2024): `TestRouting` failed because can't cleanup route `10.0.0.0/8` ``` time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=info msg="using userspace bind mode" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=info msg="create tun interface" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=info msg="assign addr 100.64.0.1 mask 0xffffff00 to utun100 interface" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=debug msg="adding Wireguard private key" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=debug msg="Route for 0.0.0.0: interface &{2 16384 lo0 up|loopback|multicast|running} nexthop 192.168.0.1, preferred source 192.168.0.1" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=debug msg="Failed to get route for ::: no route found for ::" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n add -inet 0.0.0.0/1 -interface utun100: add net 0.0.0.0: gateway utun100\n" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n add -inet 128.0.0.0/1 -interface utun100: add net 128.0.0.0: gateway utun100\n" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n add -inet6 ::/1 -interface utun100: add net ::/1: gateway utun100\n" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n add -inet6 8000::/1 -interface utun100: add net 8000::/1: gateway utun100\n" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="try to add route: 10.0.0.0/8, utun100" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="sleep 1000000000" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=warning msg="Skipping adding a new route for network 10.0.0.0/8 because it already exists" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="try to add route: 10.10.0.0/24, utun100" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=debug msg="Route for 0.0.0.0: interface &{2 16384 lo0 up|loopback|multicast|running} nexthop 192.168.0.1, preferred source 192.168.0.1" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=debug msg="Skipping adding a new route for gateway 192.168.0.1 because it is not in the network 10.10.0.0/24" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n add -inet 10.10.0.0/24 -interface utun100: add net 10.10.0.0: gateway utun100\n" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="try to add route: 127.0.10.0/24, utun100" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n add -inet 127.0.10.0/24 -interface utun100: add net 127.0.10.0: gateway utun100\n" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="try to add route: 172.16.0.0/12, utun100" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n add -inet 172.16.0.0/12 -interface utun100: add net 172.16.0.0: gateway utun100\n" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n delete -inet 172.16.0.0/12 -interface utun100: delete net 172.16.0.0: gateway utun100\n" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n delete -inet 127.0.10.0/24 -interface utun100: delete net 127.0.10.0: gateway utun100\n" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n delete -inet 10.10.0.0/24 -interface utun100: delete net 10.10.0.0: gateway utun100\n" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n delete -inet 10.0.0.0/8 -interface utun100: delete net 10.0.0.0: gateway utun100 fib 0: not in table\n" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n delete -inet 0.0.0.0/1 -interface utun100: delete net 0.0.0.0: gateway utun100\n" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n delete -inet 128.0.0.0/1 -interface utun100: delete net 128.0.0.0: gateway utun100\n" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n delete -inet6 ::/1 -interface utun100: delete net ::/1: gateway utun100\n" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="route -n delete -inet6 8000::/1 -interface utun100: delete net 8000::/1: gateway utun100\n" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=trace msg="accept unix /var/run/wireguard/utun100.sock: use of closed network connection" time="2024-08-06T21:15:16Z" level=error msg="failed to close uapi listener: bad file descriptor" --- FAIL: TestRouting (0.06s) --- FAIL: TestRouting/To_external_host_without_custom_dialer_via_vpn (0.06s) systemops_generic_test.go:368: Error Trace: /home/runner/work/netbird/netbird/client/internal/routemanager/systemops/systemops_generic_test.go:368 /usr/local/go121/src/testing/testing.go:1169 /usr/local/go121/src/testing/testing.go:1347 /usr/local/go121/src/testing/testing.go:1589 Error: Received unexpected error: failed to delete route for 10.0.0.0/8: route cmd retry failed: exit status 1 Test: TestRouting/To_external_host_without_custom_dialer_via_vpn Messages: removeVPNRoute should not return err: 10.0.0.0/8 utun100 FAIL FAIL github.com/netbirdio/netbird/client/internal/routemanager/systemops 2.017s FAIL ``` But it strange, it can't add the route to `utun100` since it already somehow appeared on `lo0` I've spend 3h and did not find the source of this, probably I should setup remote debugger to be able to run tests under debugger on remote FreeBSD machine. With my current setup it is too time consuming.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:24:29 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@skillcoder commented on GitHub (Aug 6, 2024):

TestAddRemoveRoutes

  time="2024-08-06T21:26:48Z" level=info msg="using userspace bind mode"
  time="2024-08-06T21:26:48Z" level=info msg="create tun interface"
  time="2024-08-06T21:26:48Z" level=info msg="assign addr 100.65.75.2 mask 0xffffff00 to utun530 interface"
  --- FAIL: TestAddRemoveRoutes (0.02s)
      --- FAIL: TestAddRemoveRoutes/Should_Add_And_Remove_Route_100.66.120.0/24 (0.02s)
          systemops_generic_test.go:83: 
              	Error Trace:	/home/runner/work/netbird/netbird/client/internal/routemanager/systemops/systemops_generic_test.go:416
              	            				/home/runner/work/netbird/netbird/client/internal/routemanager/systemops/systemops_generic_test.go:83
              	Error:      	Not equal: 
              	            	expected: "100.65.75.2"
              	            	actual  : "invalid IP"
              	            	
              	            	Diff:
              	            	--- Expected
              	            	+++ Actual
              	            	@@ -1 +1 @@
              	            	-100.65.75.2
              	            	+invalid IP
              	Test:       	TestAddRemoveRoutes/Should_Add_And_Remove_Route_100.66.120.0/24
              	Messages:   	route should point to wireguard interface IP
  FAIL
  FAIL	github.com/netbirdio/netbird/client/internal/routemanager/systemops	1.989s
@skillcoder commented on GitHub (Aug 6, 2024): `TestAddRemoveRoutes` ``` time="2024-08-06T21:26:48Z" level=info msg="using userspace bind mode" time="2024-08-06T21:26:48Z" level=info msg="create tun interface" time="2024-08-06T21:26:48Z" level=info msg="assign addr 100.65.75.2 mask 0xffffff00 to utun530 interface" --- FAIL: TestAddRemoveRoutes (0.02s) --- FAIL: TestAddRemoveRoutes/Should_Add_And_Remove_Route_100.66.120.0/24 (0.02s) systemops_generic_test.go:83: Error Trace: /home/runner/work/netbird/netbird/client/internal/routemanager/systemops/systemops_generic_test.go:416 /home/runner/work/netbird/netbird/client/internal/routemanager/systemops/systemops_generic_test.go:83 Error: Not equal: expected: "100.65.75.2" actual : "invalid IP" Diff: --- Expected +++ Actual @@ -1 +1 @@ -100.65.75.2 +invalid IP Test: TestAddRemoveRoutes/Should_Add_And_Remove_Route_100.66.120.0/24 Messages: route should point to wireguard interface IP FAIL FAIL github.com/netbirdio/netbird/client/internal/routemanager/systemops 1.989s ```
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:24:30 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@skillcoder commented on GitHub (Aug 7, 2024):

Found the reason of failed TestAddRemoveRoutes
bcce1bf184/client/internal/routemanager/systemops/systemops_generic.go (L381)
It was added in 370eecfa90 to fix routing on FreeBSD, without it routing was not working properly, but during refactoring it 2 return parameters replaced with Nexthop{}, I'm not sure it is right.

@skillcoder commented on GitHub (Aug 7, 2024): Found the reason of failed `TestAddRemoveRoutes` https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/blob/bcce1bf18474e68744d81a6b05b8a32e901ae771/client/internal/routemanager/systemops/systemops_generic.go#L381 It was added in https://github.com/skillcoder/netbird/commit/370eecfa908c208f8306fafd7c3800598cb6de75 to fix routing on FreeBSD, without it routing was not working properly, but during refactoring it 2 return parameters replaced with `Nexthop{}`, I'm not sure it is right.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:24:30 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@skillcoder commented on GitHub (Aug 7, 2024):

But now without this workaround tests passed.

@skillcoder commented on GitHub (Aug 7, 2024): But now without this workaround tests passed.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:24:30 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@skillcoder commented on GitHub (Aug 7, 2024):

And seems TestGetNextHop also fixed after these changes.

@skillcoder commented on GitHub (Aug 7, 2024): And seems `TestGetNextHop` also fixed after these changes.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:24:30 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@skillcoder commented on GitHub (Aug 7, 2024):

Only TestRouting left, and it's still failed with the same logs.

            	Error:      	Received unexpected error:
            	            	failed to delete route for 10.0.0.0/8: route cmd retry failed: exit status 1
            	Test:       	TestRouting/To_external_host_without_custom_dialer_via_vpn
            	Messages:   	removeVPNRoute should not return err: 10.0.0.0/8 utun100
@skillcoder commented on GitHub (Aug 7, 2024): Only `TestRouting` left, and it's still failed with the same logs. ``` Error: Received unexpected error: failed to delete route for 10.0.0.0/8: route cmd retry failed: exit status 1 Test: TestRouting/To_external_host_without_custom_dialer_via_vpn Messages: removeVPNRoute should not return err: 10.0.0.0/8 utun100 ```
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:24:30 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@skillcoder commented on GitHub (Aug 7, 2024):

Important! You can't run our netbird test in the environments with subnet 10.0.0.0/8, 192.168.0.0/24, 192.168.1.0/24.
Because we use this subnets in test, tests just will failed, so make sure you setup you FreeBSD host on some different subnet, for example 192.168.91.0/24

BTW, here is a settings and commands to debug FreeBSD tests via delve.
It seems currently dlv dap does not supported
https://github.com/golang/vscode-go/issues/2698

Remote debugging from VS Code:

launch.json

{
    "version": "0.2.0",
    "configurations": [
        {
            "name": "FreeBSD tests",
            "type": "go",
            "debugAdapter": "dlv-dap",
            "mode": "remote",
            "request": "attach",
            "substitutePath": [
                { "from": "${workspaceFolder}", "to": "/usr/home/REMOTEUSER/github/netbirdio/netbird" },
                { "from": "/usr/lib/go", "to": "/usr/local/go121" }
            ],
            "host": "192.168.91.91",
            "port": 12345,
            "showLog": true,
            "hideSystemGoroutines": true
        }
    ]
}

Run on FreeBSD

sudo pkg install delve
cd ~/github/netbirdio/netbird/client/internal/routemanager/systemops
sudo dlv test --accept-multiclient --api-version 2 --headless --listen=192.168.91.91:12345 --log

Related links:
https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=830387
https://github.com/golang/vscode-go/wiki/debugging
https://github.com/golang/vscode-go/wiki/debugging#connect-to-delve-dap-with-target-specified-at-client-start-up
https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/vscode-and-go-on-freebsd.75905/
https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/editor/variables-reference

@skillcoder commented on GitHub (Aug 7, 2024): Important! You can't run our netbird test in the environments with subnet 10.0.0.0/8, 192.168.0.0/24, 192.168.1.0/24. Because we use this subnets in test, tests just will failed, so make sure you setup you FreeBSD host on some different subnet, for example 192.168.91.0/24 BTW, here is a settings and commands to debug FreeBSD tests via delve. It seems currently `dlv dap` does not supported https://github.com/golang/vscode-go/issues/2698 # Remote debugging from VS Code: `launch.json` ```json { "version": "0.2.0", "configurations": [ { "name": "FreeBSD tests", "type": "go", "debugAdapter": "dlv-dap", "mode": "remote", "request": "attach", "substitutePath": [ { "from": "${workspaceFolder}", "to": "/usr/home/REMOTEUSER/github/netbirdio/netbird" }, { "from": "/usr/lib/go", "to": "/usr/local/go121" } ], "host": "192.168.91.91", "port": 12345, "showLog": true, "hideSystemGoroutines": true } ] } ``` ## Run on FreeBSD ```shell sudo pkg install delve cd ~/github/netbirdio/netbird/client/internal/routemanager/systemops sudo dlv test --accept-multiclient --api-version 2 --headless --listen=192.168.91.91:12345 --log ``` Related links: https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=830387 https://github.com/golang/vscode-go/wiki/debugging https://github.com/golang/vscode-go/wiki/debugging#connect-to-delve-dap-with-target-specified-at-client-start-up https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/vscode-and-go-on-freebsd.75905/ https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/editor/variables-reference
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:24:30 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@skillcoder commented on GitHub (Aug 8, 2024):

I found a reason of this workaround
If remove it netbird will create a following route

192.168.91.223     192.168.91.91      UGHS        em0

And it means route everything to local IP.
For reference
full route table

Internet:
Destination        Gateway            Flags     Netif Expire
default            192.168.91.223     UGS         em0
127.0.0.1          link#2             UH          lo0
192.168.91.0/24    link#1             U           em0
192.168.91.91      link#1             UHS         lo0
192.168.91.223     192.168.91.91      UGHS        em0

Where 192.168.91.91 is local IP
TestAddExistAndRemoveRoute can detect this problem
And it disconnect host from any external connection since default route broke.

@skillcoder commented on GitHub (Aug 8, 2024): I found a reason of this workaround If remove it `netbird` will create a following route ``` 192.168.91.223 192.168.91.91 UGHS em0 ``` And it means route everything to local IP. For reference full route table ``` Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire default 192.168.91.223 UGS em0 127.0.0.1 link#2 UH lo0 192.168.91.0/24 link#1 U em0 192.168.91.91 link#1 UHS lo0 192.168.91.223 192.168.91.91 UGHS em0 ``` Where 192.168.91.91 is local IP `TestAddExistAndRemoveRoute` can detect this problem And it disconnect host from any external connection since default route broke.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:24:30 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@skillcoder commented on GitHub (Aug 10, 2024):

This case broken

		{
			name:           "Should Not Add Route if overlaps with default gateway",
			prefix:         netip.MustParsePrefix(defaultNexthop.IP.String() + "/31"),
			shouldAddRoute: false,
		},

These workaround with returning only interface name without IP fix problem because of this code
af1b42e538/client/internal/routemanager/systemops/systemops_unix.go (L50)

@skillcoder commented on GitHub (Aug 10, 2024): This case broken ``` { name: "Should Not Add Route if overlaps with default gateway", prefix: netip.MustParsePrefix(defaultNexthop.IP.String() + "/31"), shouldAddRoute: false, }, ``` These workaround with returning only interface name without IP fix problem because of this code https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/blob/af1b42e538e74fe01b3f4398f95b4521d8ac3298/client/internal/routemanager/systemops/systemops_unix.go#L50
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:24:31 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@skillcoder commented on GitHub (Aug 13, 2024):

To be able to properly check TestAddExistAndRemoveRoute shouldAddRoute: false cases I will try to replace unreliable logs-parsing-based test
4bbedb5193/client/internal/routemanager/systemops/systemops_generic_test.go (L256)
with OpenTelemetry spans and attributes.

@skillcoder commented on GitHub (Aug 13, 2024): To be able to properly check `TestAddExistAndRemoveRoute` `shouldAddRoute: false` cases I will try to replace unreliable logs-parsing-based test https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/blob/4bbedb5193f13f1e033acd4657a9c4f41d048bde/client/internal/routemanager/systemops/systemops_generic_test.go#L256 with OpenTelemetry spans and attributes.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:24:31 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@nazarewk commented on GitHub (Apr 28, 2025):

Hello @skillcoder,

We're currently reviewing our open issues and would like to verify if this problem still exists in the latest NetBird version.

Could you please confirm if the issue is still there?

We may close this issue temporarily if we don't hear back from you within 2 weeks, but feel free to reopen it with updated information.

Thanks for your contribution to improving the project!

@nazarewk commented on GitHub (Apr 28, 2025): Hello @skillcoder, We're currently reviewing our open issues and would like to verify if this problem still exists in the [latest NetBird version](https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/releases). Could you please confirm if the issue is still there? We may close this issue temporarily if we don't hear back from you within **2 weeks**, but feel free to reopen it with updated information. Thanks for your contribution to improving the project!
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:24:31 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@mlsmaycon commented on GitHub (Jun 1, 2025):

closing issue due to no recent feedback. Feel free to open a new one if the issue persist or reopen if this was a feature request.

@mlsmaycon commented on GitHub (Jun 1, 2025): closing issue due to no recent feedback. Feel free to open a new one if the issue persist or reopen if this was a feature request.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
2021 Q4
2022 Q1
2022 Q1
accessibility
acl
agent
agent
Android
Android
api
authentik
automation
azure
battery-usage
bug
cache
client
client-ui
cloud
cloud-only
cloudflare
community
compatibility
config-idp
config-issue
connection
contribution
coturn
cross-vpn
dashboard
data-usage
distribution
dns
docker
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
event-stream
feature-request
freebsd
getting-started
go
good first issue
gui
help wanted
home-assistant
idp
inconsistency
integration
integrations
ios
ipv6
jwt
k8s
keycloak
linux
login
macos
management-service
missing-docs
mobile
moved-internal
needs-review
netbird-ui
networking
new-platform
nginx
notification
okta
openwrt
packaging
peer-management
peer-management
peer-management
performance
postgres
posture-checks
psk
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
refactor
relay
release
rfc
routes
security
security-related
self-hosting
server
signal
sleep-issue
ssh
ssl
status
store
synology
system-compatibility-issue
test-suite
third-party-integration
triage
triage-needed
troubleshooting
UX
waiting-feedback
windows
wontfix
zitadel
No Label freebsd routes waiting-feedback
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
saavagebueno
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SVI/netbird#1128
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?