SVI/netbird
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird.git synced 2026-07-27 16:32:34 -04:00
Code Issues 3.0k Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Peers are not added to new user/client #1362

New Issue
Open
opened 2025-11-20 05:29:04 -05:00 by saavagebueno · 6 comments
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:29:04 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @joao-aveiro on GitHub (Oct 24, 2024).

Describe the problem

I have a self-hosted deployment of Netbird, with Google Cloud/Workspace as the IdP. The majority of existing users were added in version 0.29.x, but it is currently running version 0.30.3. A new user just signed up and I assigned groups similarly to other users; however, this new user can't connect to any other peer and in both the "Accessible Peers" table in the management GUI and by running netbird status -d only 2 peers appear, instead of the expected 10+. Also, these two peers that show up are other users and not the expected machines in our internal compute infrastructure.

To Reproduce

  • Add new user in self-hosted Netbird + Google Cloud/Workspace IdP
  • Add groups to the user, with existing policies allowign access to other peers

Expected behavior

The target peers should be accessible if the user is assigned the correct group and there are policies in place for this.

Are you using NetBird Cloud?

No, self-hosted NetBird.

NetBird version

Tested multiple combinations of versions 0.30.2 and 0.30.3 for the client and server.

Originally created by @joao-aveiro on GitHub (Oct 24, 2024). **Describe the problem** I have a self-hosted deployment of Netbird, with Google Cloud/Workspace as the IdP. The majority of existing users were added in version 0.29.x, but it is currently running version 0.30.3. A new user just signed up and I assigned groups similarly to other users; however, this new user can't connect to any other peer and in both the "Accessible Peers" table in the management GUI and by running `netbird status -d` only 2 peers appear, instead of the expected 10+. Also, these two peers that show up are other users and not the expected machines in our internal compute infrastructure. **To Reproduce** - Add new user in self-hosted Netbird + Google Cloud/Workspace IdP - Add groups to the user, with existing policies allowign access to other peers **Expected behavior** The target peers should be accessible if the user is assigned the correct group and there are policies in place for this. **Are you using NetBird Cloud?** No, self-hosted NetBird. **NetBird version** Tested multiple combinations of versions `0.30.2` and `0.30.3` for the client and server.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:29:04 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@joao-aveiro commented on GitHub (Oct 24, 2024):

I've tried to:

  • Restart the server
  • Restart the service and client on the user's side
  • Disable and re-enable all the policies related with these groups
  • Block and unblock the user in question
  • Delete the user's peer and require re-authentication

Nothing helped.

@joao-aveiro commented on GitHub (Oct 24, 2024): I've tried to: - Restart the server - Restart the service and client on the user's side - Disable and re-enable all the policies related with these groups - Block and unblock the user in question - Delete the user's peer and require re-authentication Nothing helped.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:29:04 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@bcmmbaga commented on GitHub (Oct 24, 2024):

Hello @joao-aveiro Do you have any applied posture checks on the policy? Also, could you confirm if user group propagation in Settings > Groups is enabled?

Additionally, can you confirm if the group assigned to the user was also added to the peer?

@bcmmbaga commented on GitHub (Oct 24, 2024): Hello @joao-aveiro Do you have any applied posture checks on the policy? Also, could you confirm if user group propagation in `Settings > Groups` is enabled? Additionally, can you confirm if the group assigned to the user was also added to the peer?
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:29:05 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@mlsmaycon commented on GitHub (Nov 5, 2024):

any feedback @joao-aveiro ?

@mlsmaycon commented on GitHub (Nov 5, 2024): any feedback @joao-aveiro ?
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:29:05 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@noerdar commented on GitHub (Nov 8, 2024):

I have the same issue i think. I have a peer that advertises routes. If a new client joins the network, the peer that advertises routes does not get this new peer client, so when the client tries to contract that network, it does not work until the peer that advertises the routes are restartet with a netbird down and after netbird up, it finds all the client peers. So the Peers count: 2/5 Connected does not find the new client so i would be 3/6 in that scneario.

OS: linux/amd64
Daemon version: 0.31.0
CLI version: 0.31.0
Management: Connected to https://netbirdvpn.domain.com:443
Signal: Connected to https://netbirdvpn.domain.com:443
Relays:
[stun:netbirdvpn.domain.com:3478] is Available
[turn:netbirdvpn.domain.com:3478?transport=udp] is Available
[rels://netbirdvpn.domain.com:443] is Available
Nameservers:
[172.16.20.4:53, 192.168.140.1:53] for [domain.com] is Available
FQDN: netbird01.netbird.selfhosted
NetBird IP: 100.86.156.178/16
Interface type: Kernel
Quantum resistance: false
Routes: 192.168.1.10/24, 192.168.1.12/24
Peers count: 2/5 Connected

@noerdar commented on GitHub (Nov 8, 2024): I have the same issue i think. I have a peer that advertises routes. If a new client joins the network, the peer that advertises routes does not get this new peer client, so when the client tries to contract that network, it does not work until the peer that advertises the routes are restartet with a netbird down and after netbird up, it finds all the client peers. So the Peers count: 2/5 Connected does not find the new client so i would be 3/6 in that scneario. OS: linux/amd64 Daemon version: 0.31.0 CLI version: 0.31.0 Management: Connected to [https://netbirdvpn.domain.com:443](https://netbirdvpn.domain.com/) Signal: Connected to [https://netbirdvpn.domain.com:443](https://netbirdvpn.domain.com/) Relays: [stun:netbirdvpn.domain.com:3478] is Available [turn:netbirdvpn.domain.com:3478?transport=udp] is Available [rels://netbirdvpn.domain.com:443] is Available Nameservers: [172.16.20.4:53, 192.168.140.1:53] for [domain.com] is Available FQDN: netbird01.netbird.selfhosted NetBird IP: [100.86.156.178/16](http://100.86.156.178/16) Interface type: Kernel Quantum resistance: false Routes: 192.168.1.10/24, 192.168.1.12/24 Peers count: 2/5 Connected
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:29:05 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@nazarewk commented on GitHub (Apr 28, 2025):

Hello @joao-aveiro,

We're currently reviewing our open issues and would like to verify if this problem still exists in the latest NetBird version.

Could you please confirm if the issue is still there?

We may close this issue temporarily if we don't hear back from you within 2 weeks, but feel free to reopen it with updated information.

Thanks for your contribution to improving the project!

@nazarewk commented on GitHub (Apr 28, 2025): Hello @joao-aveiro, We're currently reviewing our open issues and would like to verify if this problem still exists in the [latest NetBird version](https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/releases). Could you please confirm if the issue is still there? We may close this issue temporarily if we don't hear back from you within **2 weeks**, but feel free to reopen it with updated information. Thanks for your contribution to improving the project!
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:29:05 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@noerdar commented on GitHub (Apr 28, 2025):

Just close it. It worked with new version.

man. 28. apr. 2025 kl. 17.37 skrev Krzysztof Nazarewski (kdn) <
@.***>:

nazarewk left a comment (netbirdio/netbird#2776)
https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/2776#issuecomment-2835667134

Hello @joao-aveiro https://github.com/joao-aveiro,

We're currently reviewing our open issues and would like to verify if this
problem still exists in the latest NetBird version
https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/releases.

Could you please confirm if the issue is still there?

We may close this issue temporarily if we don't hear back from you within 2
weeks, but feel free to reopen it with updated information.

Thanks for your contribution to improving the project!

—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/2776#issuecomment-2835667134,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC4JDMTTZXUP7TXJAXYLAND23ZDL5AVCNFSM6AAAAABQRH673CVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDQMZVGY3DOMJTGQ
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
@.***>

@noerdar commented on GitHub (Apr 28, 2025): Just close it. It worked with new version. man. 28. apr. 2025 kl. 17.37 skrev Krzysztof Nazarewski (kdn) < ***@***.***>: > *nazarewk* left a comment (netbirdio/netbird#2776) > <https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/2776#issuecomment-2835667134> > > Hello @joao-aveiro <https://github.com/joao-aveiro>, > > We're currently reviewing our open issues and would like to verify if this > problem still exists in the latest NetBird version > <https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/releases>. > > Could you please confirm if the issue is still there? > > We may close this issue temporarily if we don't hear back from you within *2 > weeks*, but feel free to reopen it with updated information. > > Thanks for your contribution to improving the project! > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/2776#issuecomment-2835667134>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC4JDMTTZXUP7TXJAXYLAND23ZDL5AVCNFSM6AAAAABQRH673CVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDQMZVGY3DOMJTGQ> > . > You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: > ***@***.***> >
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
2021 Q4
2022 Q1
2022 Q1
accessibility
acl
agent
agent
Android
Android
api
authentik
automation
azure
battery-usage
bug
cache
client
client-ui
cloud
cloud-only
cloudflare
community
compatibility
config-idp
config-issue
connection
contribution
coturn
cross-vpn
dashboard
data-usage
distribution
dns
docker
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
event-stream
feature-request
freebsd
getting-started
go
good first issue
gui
help wanted
home-assistant
idp
inconsistency
integration
integrations
ios
ipv6
jwt
k8s
keycloak
linux
login
macos
management-service
missing-docs
mobile
moved-internal
needs-review
netbird-ui
networking
new-platform
nginx
notification
okta
openwrt
packaging
peer-management
peer-management
peer-management
performance
postgres
posture-checks
psk
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
refactor
relay
release
rfc
routes
security
security-related
self-hosting
server
signal
sleep-issue
ssh
ssl
status
store
synology
system-compatibility-issue
test-suite
third-party-integration
triage
triage-needed
troubleshooting
UX
waiting-feedback
windows
wontfix
zitadel
No Label management-service peer-management self-hosting waiting-feedback
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
saavagebueno
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SVI/netbird#1362
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?