SVI/netbird
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird.git synced 2026-05-11 18:51:53 -04:00
Code Issues 3.0k Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Feature request: route groups #1402

New Issue
Open
opened 2025-11-20 05:29:40 -05:00 by saavagebueno · 3 comments
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:29:40 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @tdeb1 on GitHub (Nov 7, 2024).

The network routes feature in Netbird is awesome and provides an interesting new way to deal with overlapping IP-ranges. However when a lot of routes are being added, it quickly becomes cumbersome and cluttered to manage (both in the admin ui and in the client)

It would be nice if it was possible to create 'Network route groups'. This way the routes could be grouped and organized. It would also be nice if it were then possible to activate or deactivate route groups instead of individual routes in the Netbird client. (for example if I have an environment that needs 10 routes to be accessible, and another environment that needs 10 different routes, but they have overlap, I have to deselect the 10 routes and select the 10 other routes. It would be much nicer if I can just deselect the route group for one environment and select the route group for the other one)

An alternative would be to summarize the routes, but sometimes this is not possible or wanted.

For illustration see below screenshots, I have 12 routes for one environment, it would be nice if I could group them so users only have to check or uncheck 1 box to be routed to that specific environment.

image
image

Originally created by @tdeb1 on GitHub (Nov 7, 2024). The network routes feature in Netbird is awesome and provides an interesting new way to deal with overlapping IP-ranges. However when a lot of routes are being added, it quickly becomes cumbersome and cluttered to manage (both in the admin ui and in the client) It would be nice if it was possible to create 'Network route groups'. This way the routes could be grouped and organized. It would also be nice if it were then possible to activate or deactivate route groups instead of individual routes in the Netbird client. (for example if I have an environment that needs 10 routes to be accessible, and another environment that needs 10 different routes, but they have overlap, I have to deselect the 10 routes and select the 10 other routes. It would be much nicer if I can just deselect the route group for one environment and select the route group for the other one) An alternative would be to summarize the routes, but sometimes this is not possible or wanted. For illustration see below screenshots, I have 12 routes for one environment, it would be nice if I could group them so users only have to check or uncheck 1 box to be routed to that specific environment. ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8e21b696-4a4e-428b-8709-da272fb3e6d1) ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5360e736-3381-4929-b7b0-14e005377e33)
saavagebueno added the feature-request label 2025-11-20 05:29:40 -05:00
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:29:41 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@braginini commented on GitHub (Nov 30, 2024):

Hey @tdeb1
We are discussing a new network routes concept internally and would liek to hear out your opinin on that. Would you ming reaching out to me in Slack? Look for Mikhail (Misha) Bragin
Thank you!

@braginini commented on GitHub (Nov 30, 2024): Hey @tdeb1 We are discussing a new network routes concept internally and would liek to hear out your opinin on that. Would you ming reaching out to me in Slack? Look for Mikhail (Misha) Bragin Thank you!
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:29:41 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@tdeb1 commented on GitHub (Dec 2, 2024):

Hey @tdeb1 We are discussing a new network routes concept internally and would liek to hear out your opinin on that. Would you ming reaching out to me in Slack? Look for Mikhail (Misha) Bragin Thank you!

Hi, I have sent you a DM

@tdeb1 commented on GitHub (Dec 2, 2024): > Hey @tdeb1 We are discussing a new network routes concept internally and would liek to hear out your opinin on that. Would you ming reaching out to me in Slack? Look for Mikhail (Misha) Bragin Thank you! Hi, I have sent you a DM
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:29:41 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@tdeb1 commented on GitHub (Jan 2, 2025):

Hi @braginini

I just tested the new version with the network feature and it's a step in the right direction. However, to me it feels like the advancements made on the admin panel don't yet translate to improvements at the client side. I feel like it would be a nice addition if it's possible to route groups (aka 'Networks' in the new implementation) instead of a long list of routes (aka 'resources' in the new implementation)

Below is an example of how I could see such a feature in the client app visually (pardon the paint-skills, just a quick sketch)

Schermafbeelding 2025-01-02 135536

Are any such features planned?
Thanks already!
BR

@tdeb1 commented on GitHub (Jan 2, 2025): Hi @braginini I just tested the new version with the network feature and it's a step in the right direction. However, to me it feels like the advancements made on the admin panel don't yet translate to improvements at the client side. I feel like it would be a nice addition if it's possible to route groups (aka 'Networks' in the new implementation) instead of a long list of routes (aka 'resources' in the new implementation) Below is an example of how I could see such a feature in the client app visually (pardon the paint-skills, just a quick sketch) ![Schermafbeelding 2025-01-02 135536](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fa252cad-54e4-4aeb-bd1c-6a420c1eec64) Are any such features planned? Thanks already! BR
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
2021 Q4
2022 Q1
2022 Q1
accessibility
acl
agent
agent
Android
Android
api
authentik
automation
azure
battery-usage
bug
cache
client
client-ui
cloud
cloud-only
cloudflare
community
compatibility
config-idp
config-issue
connection
contribution
coturn
cross-vpn
dashboard
data-usage
distribution
dns
docker
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
event-stream
feature-request
freebsd
getting-started
go
good first issue
gui
help wanted
home-assistant
idp
inconsistency
integration
integrations
ios
ipv6
jwt
k8s
keycloak
linux
login
macos
management-service
missing-docs
mobile
moved-internal
needs-review
netbird-ui
networking
new-platform
nginx
notification
okta
openwrt
packaging
peer-management
peer-management
peer-management
performance
postgres
posture-checks
psk
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
refactor
relay
release
rfc
routes
security
security-related
self-hosting
server
signal
sleep-issue
ssh
ssl
status
store
synology
system-compatibility-issue
test-suite
third-party-integration
triage
triage-needed
troubleshooting
UX
waiting-feedback
windows
wontfix
zitadel
No Label feature-request
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
saavagebueno
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SVI/netbird#1402
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?