SVI/netbird
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird.git synced 2026-06-11 09:52:11 -04:00
Code Issues 3.0k Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Pls there are plans to put out servers that are not based on port 80,443 because my server has both ports disabled. #1526

New Issue
Open
opened 2025-11-20 05:32:16 -05:00 by saavagebueno · 3 comments
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:32:16 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @wwfkmd1 on GitHub (Dec 29, 2024).

Since my server can't use port 80,443, I want to use a different port instead, is there a similar plan?

Originally created by @wwfkmd1 on GitHub (Dec 29, 2024). Since my server can't use port 80,443, I want to use a different port instead, is there a similar plan?
saavagebueno added the feature-request label 2025-11-20 05:32:16 -05:00
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:32:17 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Gauss23 commented on GitHub (Dec 30, 2024):

I don't see why it wouldn't be possible to not use port 80 and 443. Without port 80 you'll loose Let's encrypt and you would need to add your own certificate for the management server or you'll need to switch to the DNS challenge for LE.

Where do you get servers with ports 80 and 443 disabled? This is a strange approach.

@Gauss23 commented on GitHub (Dec 30, 2024): I don't see why it wouldn't be possible to not use port 80 and 443. Without port 80 you'll loose Let's encrypt and you would need to add your own certificate for the management server or you'll need to switch to the DNS challenge for LE. Where do you get servers with ports 80 and 443 disabled? This is a strange approach.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:32:17 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jiangslee commented on GitHub (Jan 1, 2025):

https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/pull/2876#issuecomment-2480600532

@jiangslee commented on GitHub (Jan 1, 2025): https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/pull/2876#issuecomment-2480600532
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:32:17 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@nmincone commented on GitHub (Jan 4, 2025):

I agree with this initiative, it would be great to be able to use alternative ports. I am running into the same issue as I have NB running in a Proxmox Debian VM asking for ports 80/443 on a different IP then my Debian Docker server VM which is already using those ports.

@nmincone commented on GitHub (Jan 4, 2025): I agree with this initiative, it would be great to be able to use alternative ports. I am running into the same issue as I have NB running in a Proxmox Debian VM asking for ports 80/443 on a different IP then my Debian Docker server VM which is already using those ports.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
2021 Q4
2022 Q1
2022 Q1
accessibility
acl
agent
agent
Android
Android
api
authentik
automation
azure
battery-usage
bug
cache
client
client-ui
cloud
cloud-only
cloudflare
community
compatibility
config-idp
config-issue
connection
contribution
coturn
cross-vpn
dashboard
data-usage
distribution
dns
docker
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
event-stream
feature-request
freebsd
getting-started
go
good first issue
gui
help wanted
home-assistant
idp
inconsistency
integration
integrations
ios
ipv6
jwt
k8s
keycloak
linux
login
macos
management-service
missing-docs
mobile
moved-internal
needs-review
netbird-ui
networking
new-platform
nginx
notification
okta
openwrt
packaging
peer-management
peer-management
peer-management
performance
postgres
posture-checks
psk
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
refactor
relay
release
rfc
routes
security
security-related
self-hosting
server
signal
sleep-issue
ssh
ssl
status
store
synology
system-compatibility-issue
test-suite
third-party-integration
triage
triage-needed
troubleshooting
UX
waiting-feedback
windows
wontfix
zitadel
No Label feature-request
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
saavagebueno
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SVI/netbird#1526
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?