SVI/netbird
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird.git synced 2026-08-03 19:29:42 -04:00
Code Issues 3.0k Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

"Networks" not automatically applying on endpoint #1748

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-11-20 06:05:59 -05:00 by saavagebueno · 2 comments
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 06:05:59 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @Qu310 on GitHub (Mar 23, 2025).

I've encountered what seems to be either a bug or a UX design gap when managing resources within an existing "Network."

When adding new IP ranges or resources under an existing Network, these additions are not automatically applied to the endpoints as routes. Instead, each endpoint user has to manually open the Networks tab in their client and click to activate the newly added resource(s). This step is easy to overlook and can cause confusion or connectivity issues until it's manually addressed.

If this is the intended behavior, it would be great to have an option in the Web UI to automatically apply all routes to endpoints when new resources are added to a network — without requiring manual intervention on each endpoint.

This would greatly improve the user experience and streamline network management.

Originally created by @Qu310 on GitHub (Mar 23, 2025). I've encountered what seems to be either a bug or a UX design gap when managing resources within an existing "Network." When adding new IP ranges or resources under an existing Network, these additions are not automatically applied to the endpoints as routes. Instead, each endpoint user has to manually open the Networks tab in their client and click to activate the newly added resource(s). This step is easy to overlook and can cause confusion or connectivity issues until it's manually addressed. If this is the intended behavior, it would be great to have an option in the Web UI to automatically apply all routes to endpoints when new resources are added to a network — without requiring manual intervention on each endpoint. This would greatly improve the user experience and streamline network management.
saavagebueno added the feature-request label 2025-11-20 06:05:59 -05:00
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 06:05:59 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@lixmal commented on GitHub (Mar 25, 2025):

This is the default behavior until you deselect any route. To restore the default behavior you can hit "Select All"

@lixmal commented on GitHub (Mar 25, 2025): This is the default behavior until you deselect any route. To restore the default behavior you can hit "Select All"
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 06:06:00 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@nazarewk commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2025):

Closing as duplicate of https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/3611
sorry for hijacking, but I have found and described the root cause during call with an user.

@nazarewk commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2025): Closing as duplicate of https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/3611 sorry for hijacking, but I have found and described the root cause during call with an user.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
2021 Q4
2022 Q1
2022 Q1
accessibility
acl
agent
agent
Android
Android
api
authentik
automation
azure
battery-usage
bug
cache
client
client-ui
cloud
cloud-only
cloudflare
community
compatibility
config-idp
config-issue
connection
contribution
coturn
cross-vpn
dashboard
data-usage
distribution
dns
docker
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
event-stream
feature-request
freebsd
getting-started
go
good first issue
gui
help wanted
home-assistant
idp
inconsistency
integration
integrations
ios
ipv6
jwt
k8s
keycloak
linux
login
macos
management-service
missing-docs
mobile
moved-internal
needs-review
netbird-ui
networking
new-platform
nginx
notification
okta
openwrt
packaging
peer-management
peer-management
peer-management
performance
postgres
posture-checks
psk
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
refactor
relay
release
rfc
routes
security
security-related
self-hosting
server
signal
sleep-issue
ssh
ssl
status
store
synology
system-compatibility-issue
test-suite
third-party-integration
triage
triage-needed
troubleshooting
UX
waiting-feedback
windows
wontfix
zitadel
No Label feature-request
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
saavagebueno
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SVI/netbird#1748
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?