SVI/netbird
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird.git synced 2026-07-03 12:41:56 -04:00
Code Issues 3.0k Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Allow domain match on top-TLDs, at least private ones #1866

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-11-20 06:08:14 -05:00 by saavagebueno · 2 comments
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 06:08:14 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @juju4 on GitHub (May 4, 2025).

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
In domain management, you can match a dns server to specific domain like example.com but it is not possible to do so for top-TLDs, be it public ones (com, xyz, ...) but more for private ones aka internal, local, intranet, corp, home, lan (RFC2606, RFC6762, ICANN SAC113).
Please allow at least private top-TLDs.

Describe the solution you'd like
allow top-TLDs or at least the private ones, to be used in domain match.

Describe alternatives you've considered
infra changing top domain... unlikely

Originally created by @juju4 on GitHub (May 4, 2025). **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** In domain management, you can match a dns server to specific domain like example.com but it is not possible to do so for top-TLDs, be it public ones (com, xyz, ...) but more for private ones aka internal, local, intranet, corp, home, lan (RFC2606, RFC6762, ICANN SAC113). Please allow at least private top-TLDs. **Describe the solution you'd like** allow top-TLDs or at least the private ones, to be used in domain match. **Describe alternatives you've considered** infra changing top domain... unlikely
saavagebueno added the feature-requestdns labels 2025-11-20 06:08:14 -05:00
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 06:08:15 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@kinafu commented on GitHub (May 11, 2025):

duplicate of https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/2593

@kinafu commented on GitHub (May 11, 2025): duplicate of https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/2593
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 06:08:15 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@nazarewk commented on GitHub (May 15, 2025):

I have found numerous mislabeled/disguised feature requests related to TLD feature and will be closing those on behalf of https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/2021 , where the discussion should continue (if at all)

@nazarewk commented on GitHub (May 15, 2025): I have found numerous mislabeled/disguised feature requests related to TLD feature and will be closing those on behalf of https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/2021 , where the discussion should continue (if at all)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
2021 Q4
2022 Q1
2022 Q1
accessibility
acl
agent
agent
Android
Android
api
authentik
automation
azure
battery-usage
bug
cache
client
client-ui
cloud
cloud-only
cloudflare
community
compatibility
config-idp
config-issue
connection
contribution
coturn
cross-vpn
dashboard
data-usage
distribution
dns
docker
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
event-stream
feature-request
freebsd
getting-started
go
good first issue
gui
help wanted
home-assistant
idp
inconsistency
integration
integrations
ios
ipv6
jwt
k8s
keycloak
linux
login
macos
management-service
missing-docs
mobile
moved-internal
needs-review
netbird-ui
networking
new-platform
nginx
notification
okta
openwrt
packaging
peer-management
peer-management
peer-management
performance
postgres
posture-checks
psk
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
refactor
relay
release
rfc
routes
security
security-related
self-hosting
server
signal
sleep-issue
ssh
ssl
status
store
synology
system-compatibility-issue
test-suite
third-party-integration
triage
triage-needed
troubleshooting
UX
waiting-feedback
windows
wontfix
zitadel
No Label dns feature-request
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
saavagebueno
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SVI/netbird#1866
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?