SVI/netbird
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird.git synced 2026-07-27 16:32:34 -04:00
Code Issues 3.0k Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Request: leverage another crypto library that would allow for FIPS validation #187

New Issue
Open
opened 2025-11-20 05:07:38 -05:00 by saavagebueno · 4 comments
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:07:38 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @finnje on GitHub (Sep 12, 2022).

Wireguard itself won't be FIPS validated as the encryption algorithms aren't approved for FIPs validation, but other crypto in use, for example the netbird ssh connections could be FIPS validated if something like https://github.com/golang-fips/go was used instead of the default go crypto library.

Originally created by @finnje on GitHub (Sep 12, 2022). Wireguard itself won't be FIPS validated as the encryption algorithms aren't approved for FIPs validation, but other crypto in use, for example the netbird ssh connections could be FIPS validated if something like https://github.com/golang-fips/go was used instead of the default go crypto library.
saavagebueno added the enhancementfeature-requestagent labels 2025-11-20 05:07:38 -05:00
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:07:39 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@braginini commented on GitHub (Sep 14, 2022):

hey @finnje
Do you have an idea how to combine this lib with Golang's SSH server? I haven't looked into that yet.

@braginini commented on GitHub (Sep 14, 2022): hey @finnje Do you have an idea how to combine this lib with Golang's SSH server? I haven't looked into that yet.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:07:39 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@laserguy2020 commented on GitHub (Nov 3, 2022):

This would be awesome... +1 from me.

@laserguy2020 commented on GitHub (Nov 3, 2022): This would be awesome... +1 from me.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:07:39 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@nazarewk commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2025):

@finnje Does it still make sense if the context of the plans to replace internal SSH implementation with the reuse of the existing OpenSSH infrastructure?

@nazarewk commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2025): @finnje Does it still make sense if the context of the plans to replace internal SSH implementation with the reuse of the existing OpenSSH infrastructure?
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:07:39 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@finnje commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2025):

@nazarewk if the goal is to switch to the underlying systems ssh package like OpenSSH then no this wouldn't be required as you could ensure your system SSH package is FIPS validated if required by your environment.

@finnje commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2025): @nazarewk if the goal is to switch to the underlying systems ssh package like OpenSSH then no this wouldn't be required as you could ensure your system SSH package is FIPS validated if required by your environment.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
2021 Q4
2022 Q1
2022 Q1
accessibility
acl
agent
agent
Android
Android
api
authentik
automation
azure
battery-usage
bug
cache
client
client-ui
cloud
cloud-only
cloudflare
community
compatibility
config-idp
config-issue
connection
contribution
coturn
cross-vpn
dashboard
data-usage
distribution
dns
docker
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
event-stream
feature-request
freebsd
getting-started
go
good first issue
gui
help wanted
home-assistant
idp
inconsistency
integration
integrations
ios
ipv6
jwt
k8s
keycloak
linux
login
macos
management-service
missing-docs
mobile
moved-internal
needs-review
netbird-ui
networking
new-platform
nginx
notification
okta
openwrt
packaging
peer-management
peer-management
peer-management
performance
postgres
posture-checks
psk
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
refactor
relay
release
rfc
routes
security
security-related
self-hosting
server
signal
sleep-issue
ssh
ssl
status
store
synology
system-compatibility-issue
test-suite
third-party-integration
triage
triage-needed
troubleshooting
UX
waiting-feedback
windows
wontfix
zitadel
No Label agent enhancement feature-request
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
saavagebueno
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SVI/netbird#187
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?