SVI/netbird
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird.git synced 2026-06-10 01:12:51 -04:00
Code Issues 3.0k Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Better way to manage multiple configs #1873

New Issue
Open
opened 2025-11-20 06:08:22 -05:00 by saavagebueno · 3 comments
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 06:08:22 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @CommanderRedYT on GitHub (May 6, 2025).

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
With the ability to use systemd template files (netbird@.service), it would also be nice to be able to have the netbird cli working with every instance.

Describe the solution you'd like
Some way of managing all connections at the same time.

Describe alternatives you've considered
I already wrote a small script here: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/netbird-multiconfig.sh?h=netbird-multiconfig

Originally created by @CommanderRedYT on GitHub (May 6, 2025). **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** With the ability to use systemd template files (`netbird@.service`), it would also be nice to be able to have the `netbird` cli working with every instance. **Describe the solution you'd like** Some way of managing all connections at the same time. **Describe alternatives you've considered** I already wrote a small script here: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/netbird-multiconfig.sh?h=netbird-multiconfig
saavagebueno added the feature-request label 2025-11-20 06:08:22 -05:00
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 06:08:23 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@nazarewk commented on GitHub (May 6, 2025):

I think this will be fully covered by https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/3273

@nazarewk commented on GitHub (May 6, 2025): I think this will be fully covered by https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/3273
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 06:08:23 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@CommanderRedYT commented on GitHub (May 6, 2025):

@nazarewk as I see it, it would actually be covered by https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/446 instead of #3273, because the goal here is also to be connected to multiple networks at the same time, which is possible using the Systemd template units. I wonder however if any changes actually need to be made to the program itself, or if it is possible to just modify the CLI a bit to improve the experience and removing the need of typing in the socket, like I did with the alias.

@CommanderRedYT commented on GitHub (May 6, 2025): @nazarewk as I see it, it would actually be covered by https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/446 instead of #3273, because the goal here is also to be connected to multiple networks at the same time, which is possible using the Systemd template units. I wonder however if any changes actually need to be made to the program itself, or if it is possible to just modify the CLI a bit to improve the experience and removing the need of typing in the socket, like I did with the alias.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 06:08:24 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@nazarewk commented on GitHub (May 7, 2025):

I wonder however if any changes actually need to be made to the program itself, or if it is possible to just modify the CLI a bit to improve the experience and removing the need of typing in the socket, like I did with the alias.

#446 would involve a lot of changes to be properly supported, just modifying the CLI config would yield conflicts at least within the routing table, DNS & possibly firewall marks.

@nazarewk commented on GitHub (May 7, 2025): > I wonder however if any changes actually need to be made to the program itself, or if it is possible to just modify the CLI a bit to improve the experience and removing the need of typing in the socket, like I did with the alias. #446 would involve **a lot** of changes to be properly supported, just modifying the CLI config would yield conflicts at least within the routing table, DNS & possibly firewall marks.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
2021 Q4
2022 Q1
2022 Q1
accessibility
acl
agent
agent
Android
Android
api
authentik
automation
azure
battery-usage
bug
cache
client
client-ui
cloud
cloud-only
cloudflare
community
compatibility
config-idp
config-issue
connection
contribution
coturn
cross-vpn
dashboard
data-usage
distribution
dns
docker
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
event-stream
feature-request
freebsd
getting-started
go
good first issue
gui
help wanted
home-assistant
idp
inconsistency
integration
integrations
ios
ipv6
jwt
k8s
keycloak
linux
login
macos
management-service
missing-docs
mobile
moved-internal
needs-review
netbird-ui
networking
new-platform
nginx
notification
okta
openwrt
packaging
peer-management
peer-management
peer-management
performance
postgres
posture-checks
psk
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
refactor
relay
release
rfc
routes
security
security-related
self-hosting
server
signal
sleep-issue
ssh
ssl
status
store
synology
system-compatibility-issue
test-suite
third-party-integration
triage
triage-needed
troubleshooting
UX
waiting-feedback
windows
wontfix
zitadel
No Label feature-request
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
saavagebueno
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SVI/netbird#1873
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?