SVI/netbird
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird.git synced 2026-06-09 17:02:09 -04:00
Code Issues 3.0k Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Allow Access Policy to Refer to Peer instead of group #2040

New Issue
Open
opened 2025-11-20 06:11:41 -05:00 by saavagebueno · 0 comments
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 06:11:41 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @Blackclaws on GitHub (Jul 4, 2025).

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We have a lot of cases where we want to have individual point to point connections set up. Right now (if you're not talking about resources where this works) we can only do this via groups. This leads to lots of groups with single members that clog the group list.

Describe the solution you'd like
Ability to similar as with resources select individual peers as targets for both the Source and Destination parts of an access policy

Describe alternatives you've considered
None really, we are currently adding individual groups for peers to do this and this leads to an explosion in access policies

Additional context
The reason we are doing this is because we have set up vnc sessions on servers with fixed screen numbers (mapping to ports). As an additional security measure we only want certain devices (depending on policy) of users to be able to access certain ports. Since this is a per user mapping this then leads to the aforementioned problem.

Originally created by @Blackclaws on GitHub (Jul 4, 2025). **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** We have a lot of cases where we want to have individual point to point connections set up. Right now (if you're not talking about resources where this works) we can only do this via groups. This leads to lots of groups with single members that clog the group list. **Describe the solution you'd like** Ability to similar as with resources select individual peers as targets for both the Source and Destination parts of an access policy **Describe alternatives you've considered** None really, we are currently adding individual groups for peers to do this and this leads to an explosion in access policies **Additional context** The reason we are doing this is because we have set up vnc sessions on servers with fixed screen numbers (mapping to ports). As an additional security measure we only want certain devices (depending on policy) of users to be able to access certain ports. Since this is a per user mapping this then leads to the aforementioned problem.
saavagebueno added the feature-request label 2025-11-20 06:11:41 -05:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
2021 Q4
2022 Q1
2022 Q1
accessibility
acl
agent
agent
Android
Android
api
authentik
automation
azure
battery-usage
bug
cache
client
client-ui
cloud
cloud-only
cloudflare
community
compatibility
config-idp
config-issue
connection
contribution
coturn
cross-vpn
dashboard
data-usage
distribution
dns
docker
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
event-stream
feature-request
freebsd
getting-started
go
good first issue
gui
help wanted
home-assistant
idp
inconsistency
integration
integrations
ios
ipv6
jwt
k8s
keycloak
linux
login
macos
management-service
missing-docs
mobile
moved-internal
needs-review
netbird-ui
networking
new-platform
nginx
notification
okta
openwrt
packaging
peer-management
peer-management
peer-management
performance
postgres
posture-checks
psk
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
refactor
relay
release
rfc
routes
security
security-related
self-hosting
server
signal
sleep-issue
ssh
ssl
status
store
synology
system-compatibility-issue
test-suite
third-party-integration
triage
triage-needed
troubleshooting
UX
waiting-feedback
windows
wontfix
zitadel
No Label feature-request
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
saavagebueno
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SVI/netbird#2040
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?