SVI/netbird
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird.git synced 2026-06-09 17:02:09 -04:00
Code Issues 3.0k Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

[Feature request] - IOT - ESP32 / Arduino port or support #2161

New Issue
Open
opened 2025-11-20 07:05:00 -05:00 by saavagebueno · 1 comment
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 07:05:00 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @x9t9 on GitHub (Aug 11, 2025).

First of all - Thanks for the great project, it's a great help for many projects - and appologies if this issue is tin the wrong place / repo _ was not sure where to post it ( ports ) so I settled on the main one.
If something like that exists - please reference - I did not found it in any search.

tl;dr
Implement dedicated ESP32 ports in Netbird to enhance IoT device integration, addressing the growing demand for connectivity in the IoT landscape.

By template :

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The absence of dedicated support for ESP32 ( and / or Arduino support ) platforms in Netbird limits the direct integration of IoT devices, which IMHO is critical given the vast implementation of ESP in millions and billions of connected devices in the Internet of Things (IoT). While WireGuard implementations exist for these platforms, they do not offer the comprehensive features and management capabilities that Netbird provides.

Describe the solution you'd like
Implementation of a dedicated ESP32 ports within Netbird to facilitate seamless integration of connectivity and management of IoT devices directly to the netwbird ecosystem or mashes / netwroks.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Alternative networking solutions, including existing WireGuard implementations, are available but often lack the robust features, security and most of all - easy management and configuration that Netbird offers, making them less suitable for comprehensive IoT applications.

Additional context
Supporting ESP32 and Arduino will enhance Netbird's appeal in the IoT market, enabling developers to leverage these popular platforms effectively.

NOTE regarding Arduino - I mentioned Arduino etc support for the IDE ( whcih is many times used also for ESP ) but for sure - on the professional market level Arduino itself is much less important - but has it's strength in adding a target audiance of beginners, makers, tinkers etc.

Originally created by @x9t9 on GitHub (Aug 11, 2025). First of all - Thanks for the great project, it's a great help for many projects - and appologies if this issue is tin the wrong place / repo _ was not sure where to post it ( ports ) so I settled on the main one. If something like that exists - please reference - I did not found it in any search. _**tl;dr**_ Implement dedicated **ESP32** ports in **Netbird** to enhance IoT device integration, addressing the growing demand for connectivity in the IoT landscape. By template : **_Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe._** The absence of dedicated support for ESP32 ( and / or Arduino support ) platforms in Netbird limits the direct integration of IoT devices, which IMHO is critical given the vast implementation of ESP in millions and billions of connected devices in the Internet of Things (IoT). While WireGuard implementations exist for these platforms, they do not offer the comprehensive features and management capabilities that Netbird provides. **_Describe the solution you'd like_** Implementation of a dedicated ESP32 ports within Netbird to facilitate seamless integration of connectivity and management of IoT devices directly to the netwbird ecosystem or mashes / netwroks. **_Describe alternatives you've considered_** Alternative networking solutions, including existing WireGuard implementations, are available but often lack the robust features, security and most of all - easy management and configuration that Netbird offers, making them less suitable for comprehensive IoT applications. **_Additional context_** Supporting ESP32 and Arduino will enhance Netbird's appeal in the IoT market, enabling developers to leverage these popular platforms effectively. NOTE regarding Arduino - I mentioned Arduino etc support for the IDE ( whcih is many times used also for ESP ) but for sure - on the professional market level Arduino itself is much less important - but has it's strength in adding a target audiance of beginners, makers, tinkers etc.
saavagebueno added the feature-request label 2025-11-20 07:05:00 -05:00
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 07:05:01 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@f3nici commented on GitHub (Nov 16, 2025):

+1

@f3nici commented on GitHub (Nov 16, 2025): +1
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
2021 Q4
2022 Q1
2022 Q1
accessibility
acl
agent
agent
Android
Android
api
authentik
automation
azure
battery-usage
bug
cache
client
client-ui
cloud
cloud-only
cloudflare
community
compatibility
config-idp
config-issue
connection
contribution
coturn
cross-vpn
dashboard
data-usage
distribution
dns
docker
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
event-stream
feature-request
freebsd
getting-started
go
good first issue
gui
help wanted
home-assistant
idp
inconsistency
integration
integrations
ios
ipv6
jwt
k8s
keycloak
linux
login
macos
management-service
missing-docs
mobile
moved-internal
needs-review
netbird-ui
networking
new-platform
nginx
notification
okta
openwrt
packaging
peer-management
peer-management
peer-management
performance
postgres
posture-checks
psk
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
refactor
relay
release
rfc
routes
security
security-related
self-hosting
server
signal
sleep-issue
ssh
ssl
status
store
synology
system-compatibility-issue
test-suite
third-party-integration
triage
triage-needed
troubleshooting
UX
waiting-feedback
windows
wontfix
zitadel
No Label feature-request
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
saavagebueno
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SVI/netbird#2161
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?