SVI/netbird
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird.git synced 2026-08-04 19:55:09 -04:00
Code Issues 3.0k Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Possible routing issue when using tunnel bonding software? #2277

New Issue
Open
opened 2025-11-20 07:06:53 -05:00 by saavagebueno · 0 comments
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 07:06:53 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @bodleytunes on GitHub (Sep 13, 2025).

Hi

I used speedify bonding software when I'm travelling around which allows me to bond together multiple connctions such as wifi, 5G, USB etc

This works fine with my legacy Wireguard VPN client, I can access my internal network fine (windows laptop).

However with Netbird, I find I can't get to any internal network IP addresses, internet is working but I'm unable to reach my secure / tunnelled networks. If however I stop using speedify, then netbird works and I'm able to hit private ranges.

I don't see what netbird could be doing differently to not allow it to work with bonding software whereas standard plain old wireguard works fine? I thought netbird used wireguard under the hood anyway? I know the routing is different but it seems there some kind of clash between speedify and netbird, and its a bit frustrating as I would prefer to use netbird than standard wireguard.

Any ideas of what I can do to troubleshoot?

Thanks!

Jon.

Originally created by @bodleytunes on GitHub (Sep 13, 2025). Hi I used speedify bonding software when I'm travelling around which allows me to bond together multiple connctions such as wifi, 5G, USB etc This works fine with my legacy Wireguard VPN client, I can access my internal network fine (windows laptop). However with Netbird, I find I can't get to any internal network IP addresses, internet is working but I'm unable to reach my secure / tunnelled networks. If however I stop using speedify, then netbird works and I'm able to hit private ranges. I don't see what netbird could be doing differently to not allow it to work with bonding software whereas standard plain old wireguard works fine? I thought netbird used wireguard under the hood anyway? I know the routing is different but it seems there some kind of clash between speedify and netbird, and its a bit frustrating as I would prefer to use netbird than standard wireguard. Any ideas of what I can do to troubleshoot? Thanks! Jon.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
2021 Q4
2022 Q1
2022 Q1
accessibility
acl
agent
agent
Android
Android
api
authentik
automation
azure
battery-usage
bug
cache
client
client-ui
cloud
cloud-only
cloudflare
community
compatibility
config-idp
config-issue
connection
contribution
coturn
cross-vpn
dashboard
data-usage
distribution
dns
docker
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
event-stream
feature-request
freebsd
getting-started
go
good first issue
gui
help wanted
home-assistant
idp
inconsistency
integration
integrations
ios
ipv6
jwt
k8s
keycloak
linux
login
macos
management-service
missing-docs
mobile
moved-internal
needs-review
netbird-ui
networking
new-platform
nginx
notification
okta
openwrt
packaging
peer-management
peer-management
peer-management
performance
postgres
posture-checks
psk
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
refactor
relay
release
rfc
routes
security
security-related
self-hosting
server
signal
sleep-issue
ssh
ssl
status
store
synology
system-compatibility-issue
test-suite
third-party-integration
triage
triage-needed
troubleshooting
UX
waiting-feedback
windows
wontfix
zitadel
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
saavagebueno
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SVI/netbird#2277
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?