SVI/netbird
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird.git synced 2026-06-12 10:22:25 -04:00
Code Issues 3.0k Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Mullvad VPN support #442

New Issue
Open
opened 2025-11-20 05:11:24 -05:00 by saavagebueno · 11 comments
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:11:24 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @RandomTypek on GitHub (Sep 9, 2023).

Tailscale just announced Mullvad integration, it would be great to see this on Netbird as well.

Originally created by @RandomTypek on GitHub (Sep 9, 2023). Tailscale just announced [Mullvad integration](https://tailscale.com/blog/mullvad-integration/), it would be great to see this on Netbird as well.
saavagebueno added the feature-request label 2025-11-20 05:11:24 -05:00
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:11:25 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@shyim commented on GitHub (Sep 9, 2023):

Maybe this should be generically implemented aka importing Wireguard configs, and then it will be displayed to the user.

@shyim commented on GitHub (Sep 9, 2023): Maybe this should be generically implemented aka importing Wireguard configs, and then it will be displayed to the user.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:11:25 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@pappz commented on GitHub (Sep 11, 2023):

Thank you for the report. We will consider our possibilities.

@pappz commented on GitHub (Sep 11, 2023): Thank you for the report. We will consider our possibilities.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:11:25 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@pappz commented on GitHub (Sep 13, 2023):

Hello @RandomTypek,
we are planning our Q4 roadmap and will include routing all traffic through a NetBird peer development. We will consider a similar integration as well as part of the feature.

@pappz commented on GitHub (Sep 13, 2023): Hello @RandomTypek, we are planning our Q4 roadmap and will include routing all traffic through a NetBird peer development. We will consider a similar integration as well as part of the feature.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:11:25 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@CallMeR commented on GitHub (Nov 2, 2023):

routing all traffic through a NetBird peer

Does this feature have any similarity with Tailscale's Exit Node feature?

@CallMeR commented on GitHub (Nov 2, 2023): > routing all traffic through a NetBird peer Does this feature have any similarity with Tailscale's Exit Node feature?
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:11:26 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@chukfinley commented on GitHub (Nov 23, 2024):

+1 also waiting for this!

@chukfinley commented on GitHub (Nov 23, 2024): +1 also waiting for this!
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:11:26 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@nazarewk commented on GitHub (Apr 28, 2025):

Hello @RandomTypek,

We're currently reviewing our open issues and would like to verify if this problem still exists in the latest NetBird version.

Could you please confirm if the issue is still there?

We may close this issue temporarily if we don't hear back from you within 2 weeks, but feel free to reopen it with updated information.

Thanks for your contribution to improving the project!

@nazarewk commented on GitHub (Apr 28, 2025): Hello @RandomTypek, We're currently reviewing our open issues and would like to verify if this problem still exists in the [latest NetBird version](https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/releases). Could you please confirm if the issue is still there? We may close this issue temporarily if we don't hear back from you within **2 weeks**, but feel free to reopen it with updated information. Thanks for your contribution to improving the project!
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:11:26 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Alemiz112 commented on GitHub (May 17, 2025):

Hey, I believe this is still an interesting feature to add to Netbird.

It could be probably expanded to being able to import native Wireguard peers acting as Exit Nodes/routers and that Netbird clients can connect to.

@Alemiz112 commented on GitHub (May 17, 2025): Hey, I believe this is still an interesting feature to add to Netbird. It could be probably expanded to being able to import native Wireguard peers acting as Exit Nodes/routers and that Netbird clients can connect to.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:11:26 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@chaoticbear commented on GitHub (May 22, 2025):

There are two ways this issue title could be interpreted, and both would be very useful.

  1. Exit node Allowing [Wireguard config based VPNs] to be used as exit nodes either directly from the server node or via an exit node. (based on the link the OP meant this)
  2. Co-existence on a host Allowing [Wireguard config based VPNs] to be used alongside the netbird client and handling routing such that they both work as expected. This may require the other client to co-operate, but there may be something on the netbird client side that could make it easier.

I'm considering finding a way to containerize both VPN clients and chain or route traffic through the right container. Could be used for the host traffic alone or as an exit node through the anonymized VPN, or even a few VPNs (or Tor / I2P, etc.) for different specific use cases.

This may be something your the Netbird team (or in conjunction with an anonymized VPN company) could set up as a faster on host method.

I would imagine there's a big crossover demographic for this product and anonymizing VPNs that would make this worthwhile to put time into.

@chaoticbear commented on GitHub (May 22, 2025): There are two ways this issue title could be interpreted, and both would be very useful. 1. **Exit node** Allowing [Wireguard config based VPNs] to be used as exit nodes either directly from the server node or via an exit node. (based on the link the OP meant this) 2. **Co-existence on a host** Allowing [Wireguard config based VPNs] to be used alongside the netbird client and handling routing such that they both work as expected. This may require the other client to co-operate, but there may be something on the netbird client side that could make it easier. I'm considering finding a way to containerize both VPN clients and chain or route traffic through the right container. Could be used for the host traffic alone or as an exit node through the anonymized VPN, or even a few VPNs (or Tor / I2P, etc.) for different specific use cases. This may be something your the Netbird team (or in conjunction with an anonymized VPN company) could set up as a faster on host method. I would imagine there's a big crossover demographic for this product and anonymizing VPNs that would make this worthwhile to put time into.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:11:26 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@lixmal commented on GitHub (May 22, 2025):

@chaoticbear have you looked into https://github.com/qdm12/gluetun?

@lixmal commented on GitHub (May 22, 2025): @chaoticbear have you looked into https://github.com/qdm12/gluetun?
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:11:26 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@chaoticbear commented on GitHub (May 22, 2025):

@chaoticbear have you looked into https://github.com/qdm12/gluetun?

Thanks @lixmal this looks super useful, maybe not the whole solution but definitely part of the way there.

@chaoticbear commented on GitHub (May 22, 2025): > [@chaoticbear](https://github.com/chaoticbear) have you looked into https://github.com/qdm12/gluetun? Thanks @lixmal this looks super useful, maybe not the whole solution but definitely part of the way there.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:11:26 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@chrislongros commented on GitHub (Nov 16, 2025):

Any news about future Mullvad implementation?

@chrislongros commented on GitHub (Nov 16, 2025): Any news about future Mullvad implementation?
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
2021 Q4
2022 Q1
2022 Q1
accessibility
acl
agent
agent
Android
Android
api
authentik
automation
azure
battery-usage
bug
cache
client
client-ui
cloud
cloud-only
cloudflare
community
compatibility
config-idp
config-issue
connection
contribution
coturn
cross-vpn
dashboard
data-usage
distribution
dns
docker
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
event-stream
feature-request
freebsd
getting-started
go
good first issue
gui
help wanted
home-assistant
idp
inconsistency
integration
integrations
ios
ipv6
jwt
k8s
keycloak
linux
login
macos
management-service
missing-docs
mobile
moved-internal
needs-review
netbird-ui
networking
new-platform
nginx
notification
okta
openwrt
packaging
peer-management
peer-management
peer-management
performance
postgres
posture-checks
psk
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
refactor
relay
release
rfc
routes
security
security-related
self-hosting
server
signal
sleep-issue
ssh
ssl
status
store
synology
system-compatibility-issue
test-suite
third-party-integration
triage
triage-needed
troubleshooting
UX
waiting-feedback
windows
wontfix
zitadel
No Label feature-request
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
saavagebueno
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SVI/netbird#442
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?