SVI/netbird
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird.git synced 2026-07-05 13:42:10 -04:00
Code Issues 3.0k Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

windows peer cannot be selected in Routing Peer #482

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-11-20 05:12:11 -05:00 by saavagebueno · 12 comments
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:12:11 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @wgetnz on GitHub (Oct 25, 2023).

My English is not very good. I found that when adding Network Routes, Windows client peers cannot be selected in Routing Peer, but Linux clients can.

Originally created by @wgetnz on GitHub (Oct 25, 2023). My English is not very good. I found that when adding Network Routes, Windows client peers cannot be selected in Routing Peer, but Linux clients can.
saavagebueno added the feature-requestwindows labels 2025-11-20 05:12:11 -05:00
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:12:11 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@mlsmaycon commented on GitHub (Oct 25, 2023):

Hello @wgetnz , that is the expected behavior. Network routes require a Linux node to route packets.

@mlsmaycon commented on GitHub (Oct 25, 2023): Hello @wgetnz , that is the expected behavior. Network routes require a Linux node to route packets.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:12:12 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@wgetnz commented on GitHub (Oct 25, 2023):

Hello @wgetnz , that is the expected behavior. Network routes require a Linux node to route packets.

In other words, Windows nodes will not be able to become routing nodes in the future?

@wgetnz commented on GitHub (Oct 25, 2023): > Hello @wgetnz , that is the expected behavior. Network routes require a Linux node to route packets. In other words, Windows nodes will not be able to become routing nodes in the future?
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:12:12 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@mlsmaycon commented on GitHub (Oct 25, 2023):

@mlsmaycon, In the future, they will but we don't have an estimation when we will work on it yet.

@mlsmaycon commented on GitHub (Oct 25, 2023): @mlsmaycon, In the future, they will but we don't have an estimation when we will work on it yet.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:12:12 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@grahamIT commented on GitHub (Jan 17, 2024):

Does anyone have alternatives to this? I right now I am looking into just using Nginx Streams to forward traffic but I have a feeling there much be an easier way.

@grahamIT commented on GitHub (Jan 17, 2024): Does anyone have alternatives to this? I right now I am looking into just using Nginx Streams to forward traffic but I have a feeling there much be an easier way.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:12:12 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@wgetnz commented on GitHub (May 3, 2024):

Does anyone have alternatives to this? I right now I am looking into just using Nginx Streams to forward traffic but I have a feeling there much be an easier way.

I am currently using headscale, but it does not have webui. Netbird has webui but does not support Windows Routing, which makes me very distressed.

@wgetnz commented on GitHub (May 3, 2024): > Does anyone have alternatives to this? I right now I am looking into just using Nginx Streams to forward traffic but I have a feeling there much be an easier way. I am currently using headscale, but it does not have webui. Netbird has webui but does not support Windows Routing, which makes me very distressed.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:12:12 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Rob787 commented on GitHub (Oct 16, 2024):

+1 for this feature to use on some Windows Servers

@Rob787 commented on GitHub (Oct 16, 2024): +1 for this feature to use on some Windows Servers
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:12:12 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@bscheewe commented on GitHub (Feb 5, 2025):

This is the only reason we cancelled our trial. Once Windows devices can be routing peers we can move our customers to Netbird.

@bscheewe commented on GitHub (Feb 5, 2025): This is the only reason we cancelled our trial. Once Windows devices can be routing peers we can move our customers to Netbird.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:12:13 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@wgetnz commented on GitHub (Feb 5, 2025):

This is the only reason we cancelled our trial. Once Windows devices can be routing peers we can move our customers to Netbird.

+1

@wgetnz commented on GitHub (Feb 5, 2025): > This is the only reason we cancelled our trial. Once Windows devices can be routing peers we can move our customers to Netbird. +1
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:12:13 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@lixmal commented on GitHub (Feb 21, 2025):

Released in v0.36.6

@lixmal commented on GitHub (Feb 21, 2025): Released in v0.36.6
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:12:13 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Sympatron commented on GitHub (Feb 21, 2025):

I can't find this in the release notes. Is it this PR: #3134?

@Sympatron commented on GitHub (Feb 21, 2025): I can't find this in the release notes. Is it this PR: #3134?
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:12:13 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@lixmal commented on GitHub (Feb 21, 2025):

Yes

@lixmal commented on GitHub (Feb 21, 2025): Yes
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:12:13 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@bscheewe commented on GitHub (Feb 26, 2025):

This is great news! I just tested it out and I'm super impressed. I'm going to start talking to my customers about migrating to Netbird.

@bscheewe commented on GitHub (Feb 26, 2025): This is great news! I just tested it out and I'm super impressed. I'm going to start talking to my customers about migrating to Netbird.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
2021 Q4
2022 Q1
2022 Q1
accessibility
acl
agent
agent
Android
Android
api
authentik
automation
azure
battery-usage
bug
cache
client
client-ui
cloud
cloud-only
cloudflare
community
compatibility
config-idp
config-issue
connection
contribution
coturn
cross-vpn
dashboard
data-usage
distribution
dns
docker
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
event-stream
feature-request
freebsd
getting-started
go
good first issue
gui
help wanted
home-assistant
idp
inconsistency
integration
integrations
ios
ipv6
jwt
k8s
keycloak
linux
login
macos
management-service
missing-docs
mobile
moved-internal
needs-review
netbird-ui
networking
new-platform
nginx
notification
okta
openwrt
packaging
peer-management
peer-management
peer-management
performance
postgres
posture-checks
psk
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
refactor
relay
release
rfc
routes
security
security-related
self-hosting
server
signal
sleep-issue
ssh
ssl
status
store
synology
system-compatibility-issue
test-suite
third-party-integration
triage
triage-needed
troubleshooting
UX
waiting-feedback
windows
wontfix
zitadel
No Label feature-request windows
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
saavagebueno
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SVI/netbird#482
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?