SVI/netbird
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird.git synced 2026-08-04 19:55:09 -04:00
Code Issues 3.0k Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Whether netbird has functions similar to tailscale Mullvad VPN egress node？ #634

New Issue
Open
opened 2025-11-20 05:14:58 -05:00 by saavagebueno · 7 comments
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:14:58 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @Lotusrootsoup on GitHub (Feb 13, 2024).

Whether netbird has functions similar to tailscale Mullvad VPN egress node？

Originally created by @Lotusrootsoup on GitHub (Feb 13, 2024). Whether netbird has functions similar to tailscale Mullvad VPN egress node？
saavagebueno added the feature-requestwaiting-feedback labels 2025-11-20 05:14:58 -05:00
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:14:59 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@surik commented on GitHub (Feb 13, 2024):

Hi @Lotusrootsoup, we don't have it yet but this is often requested feature, see
https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/1138
https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/289
https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/528

I want to confirm this is part of our public roadmap and work planned for March 2024
https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/projects/2

@surik commented on GitHub (Feb 13, 2024): Hi @Lotusrootsoup, we don't have it yet but this is often requested feature, see https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/1138 https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/289 https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/528 I want to confirm this is part of our public roadmap and work planned for March 2024 https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/projects/2
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:14:59 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Lotusrootsoup commented on GitHub (Feb 24, 2024):

你好@Lotusrootsoup，我们还没有，但这是经常要求的功能，请参阅 #1138 #289 #528

我想确认这是我们公共路线图和 2024 年 3 月计划工作的一部分 https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/projects/2

Thank you for your answer and look forward to your new features!

@Lotusrootsoup commented on GitHub (Feb 24, 2024): > 你好@Lotusrootsoup，我们还没有，但这是经常要求的功能，请参阅 [#1138 ](https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/1138) [#289 ](https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/289) #528 > > 我想确认这是我们公共路线图和 2024 年 3 月计划工作的一部分 https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/projects/2 Thank you for your answer and look forward to your new features!
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:14:59 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@nazarewk commented on GitHub (Apr 18, 2025):

@Lotusrootsoup I believe it can be closed due to introduction of dedicated Exit Nodes?

@nazarewk commented on GitHub (Apr 18, 2025): @Lotusrootsoup I believe it can be closed due to introduction of dedicated Exit Nodes?
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:14:59 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@shuaibmunshi commented on GitHub (Apr 25, 2025):

@nazarewk dedicated exit nodes are not a replacement for the feature being requested here. Tailscale's mullvad integration turns tailscale into a coordination service and your internet-bound traffic exits through mullvad's exit nodes automatically. In order to do the same with netbird presently you need to turn one of your own nodes into a wireguard peer node and do the routing between the VPNs yourself.

https://mullvad.net/en/blog/2023/9/7/tailscale-has-partnered-with-mullvad

@shuaibmunshi commented on GitHub (Apr 25, 2025): @nazarewk dedicated exit nodes are not a replacement for the feature being requested here. Tailscale's mullvad integration turns tailscale into a coordination service and your internet-bound traffic exits through mullvad's exit nodes automatically. In order to do the same with netbird presently you need to turn one of your own nodes into a wireguard peer node and do the routing between the VPNs yourself. https://mullvad.net/en/blog/2023/9/7/tailscale-has-partnered-with-mullvad
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:15:00 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@tabalugadreieck commented on GitHub (Sep 18, 2025):

I want to add that I would also really like to see this feature. Be it mullvad or some other privacy VPN provider. Its the only thing that keeps me on tailscale atm.
Having netbird handle the authentication with the privacy VPN provider adds another stage that makes it even more difficult to identify you than just using a privacy VPN standalone.
Is there some roadmap for it?

@tabalugadreieck commented on GitHub (Sep 18, 2025): I want to add that I would also really like to see this feature. Be it mullvad or some other privacy VPN provider. Its the only thing that keeps me on tailscale atm. Having netbird handle the authentication with the privacy VPN provider adds another stage that makes it even more difficult to identify you than just using a privacy VPN standalone. Is there some roadmap for it?
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:15:00 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@oldgit27 commented on GitHub (Oct 27, 2025):

I want to add that I would also really like to see this feature. Be it mullvad or some other privacy VPN provider. Its the only thing that keeps me on tailscale atm. Having netbird handle the authentication with the privacy VPN provider adds another stage that makes it even more difficult to identify you than just using a privacy VPN standalone. Is there some roadmap for it?

Likewise this is the only missing feature that prevents me from switching from Tailscale to Netbird. The rest looks superb.

@oldgit27 commented on GitHub (Oct 27, 2025): > I want to add that I would also really like to see this feature. Be it mullvad or some other privacy VPN provider. Its the only thing that keeps me on tailscale atm. Having netbird handle the authentication with the privacy VPN provider adds another stage that makes it even more difficult to identify you than just using a privacy VPN standalone. Is there some roadmap for it? Likewise this is the only missing feature that prevents me from switching from Tailscale to Netbird. The rest looks superb.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:15:00 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@chukfinley commented on GitHub (Nov 1, 2025):

+1!

@chukfinley commented on GitHub (Nov 1, 2025): +1!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
2021 Q4
2022 Q1
2022 Q1
accessibility
acl
agent
agent
Android
Android
api
authentik
automation
azure
battery-usage
bug
cache
client
client-ui
cloud
cloud-only
cloudflare
community
compatibility
config-idp
config-issue
connection
contribution
coturn
cross-vpn
dashboard
data-usage
distribution
dns
docker
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
event-stream
feature-request
freebsd
getting-started
go
good first issue
gui
help wanted
home-assistant
idp
inconsistency
integration
integrations
ios
ipv6
jwt
k8s
keycloak
linux
login
macos
management-service
missing-docs
mobile
moved-internal
needs-review
netbird-ui
networking
new-platform
nginx
notification
okta
openwrt
packaging
peer-management
peer-management
peer-management
performance
postgres
posture-checks
psk
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
refactor
relay
release
rfc
routes
security
security-related
self-hosting
server
signal
sleep-issue
ssh
ssl
status
store
synology
system-compatibility-issue
test-suite
third-party-integration
triage
triage-needed
troubleshooting
UX
waiting-feedback
windows
wontfix
zitadel
No Label feature-request waiting-feedback
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
saavagebueno
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SVI/netbird#634
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?