SVI/netbird
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird.git synced 2026-07-25 07:22:35 -04:00
Code Issues 3.0k Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Can we support dynamic routing protocols such as ospf and bgp?or --advertise-routes-interface=? #687

New Issue
Open
opened 2025-11-20 05:15:58 -05:00 by saavagebueno · 3 comments
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:15:58 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @masx200 on GitHub (Mar 9, 2024).

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]
Can we support dynamic routing protocols such as ospf and bgp?

Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.

Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

Originally created by @masx200 on GitHub (Mar 9, 2024). **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...] Can we support dynamic routing protocols such as ospf and bgp? **Describe the solution you'd like** A clear and concise description of what you want to happen. **Describe alternatives you've considered** A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered. **Additional context** Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
saavagebueno added the feature-request label 2025-11-20 05:15:58 -05:00
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:15:59 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@masx200 commented on GitHub (Mar 12, 2024):

Or you can change the method of publishing routes, you need to authorize some devices to publish routes to the controller, the controller automatically allows these routes, the routes can be obtained from the system routing table of the device, or you can select according to the interface of the device, so that if the route will automatically change, such as DHCPV6 and other ways to obtain the dynamic route, or through OSPF to obtain the dynamic route, so that there is no need to manually set the static route on the controller.

或者可以换一种发布路由的方法,需要授权某些设备发布路由到控制器,控制器自动允许这些路由,路由可以从设备的系统路由表中获取,也可以按照设备的接口进行选择,这样如果路由会自动发生变化,比如说dhcpv6等方式获取的动态路由,或者是通过ospf获得的动态路由,这样就不需要在控制器上手动设定静态路由了.

@masx200 commented on GitHub (Mar 12, 2024): Or you can change the method of publishing routes, you need to authorize some devices to publish routes to the controller, the controller automatically allows these routes, the routes can be obtained from the system routing table of the device, or you can select according to the interface of the device, so that if the route will automatically change, such as DHCPV6 and other ways to obtain the dynamic route, or through OSPF to obtain the dynamic route, so that there is no need to manually set the static route on the controller. 或者可以换一种发布路由的方法,需要授权某些设备发布路由到控制器,控制器自动允许这些路由,路由可以从设备的系统路由表中获取,也可以按照设备的接口进行选择,这样如果路由会自动发生变化,比如说dhcpv6等方式获取的动态路由,或者是通过ospf获得的动态路由,这样就不需要在控制器上手动设定静态路由了.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:15:59 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@masx200 commented on GitHub (Mar 12, 2024):

for example

--advertise-routes-interface=lan
@masx200 commented on GitHub (Mar 12, 2024): for example ``` --advertise-routes-interface=lan ```
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:15:59 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@nazarewk commented on GitHub (Apr 18, 2025):

seems to be closely related to https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/1602

@nazarewk commented on GitHub (Apr 18, 2025): seems to be closely related to https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/1602
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
2021 Q4
2022 Q1
2022 Q1
accessibility
acl
agent
agent
Android
Android
api
authentik
automation
azure
battery-usage
bug
cache
client
client-ui
cloud
cloud-only
cloudflare
community
compatibility
config-idp
config-issue
connection
contribution
coturn
cross-vpn
dashboard
data-usage
distribution
dns
docker
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
event-stream
feature-request
freebsd
getting-started
go
good first issue
gui
help wanted
home-assistant
idp
inconsistency
integration
integrations
ios
ipv6
jwt
k8s
keycloak
linux
login
macos
management-service
missing-docs
mobile
moved-internal
needs-review
netbird-ui
networking
new-platform
nginx
notification
okta
openwrt
packaging
peer-management
peer-management
peer-management
performance
postgres
posture-checks
psk
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
refactor
relay
release
rfc
routes
security
security-related
self-hosting
server
signal
sleep-issue
ssh
ssl
status
store
synology
system-compatibility-issue
test-suite
third-party-integration
triage
triage-needed
troubleshooting
UX
waiting-feedback
windows
wontfix
zitadel
No Label feature-request
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
saavagebueno
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SVI/netbird#687
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?