SVI/netbird
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird.git synced 2026-05-13 11:41:58 -04:00
Code Issues 3.0k Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Linux split tunneling #692

New Issue
Open
opened 2025-11-20 05:16:04 -05:00 by saavagebueno · 4 comments
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:16:04 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @Victor239 on GitHub (Mar 10, 2024).

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently I use mullvad-exclude whilst using MullvadVPN to exclude specific applications from the VPN (e.g. GeForce NOW because I want to minimise latency, sometimes my browsers if my internet connection is poor, etc).

I'd like to replicate this setup once exit nodes are available, so that my devices are all connected to an exit node but I can exclude specific apps.

Describe the solution you'd like
netbird-exclude as a prefix command in order to launch any application outside of the mesh VPN.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Mullvad supports exit nodes and split tunneling but lacks mesh VPN capabilities. Tailscale offers exit nodes but doesn't support split tunneling.

Additional context
N/A

Originally created by @Victor239 on GitHub (Mar 10, 2024). **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** Currently I use [mullvad-exclude](https://github.com/mullvad/mullvadvpn-app/pull/1581) whilst using MullvadVPN to exclude specific applications from the VPN (e.g. GeForce NOW because I want to minimise latency, sometimes my browsers if my internet connection is poor, etc). I'd like to replicate this setup once [exit nodes](https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/289) are available, so that my devices are all connected to an exit node but I can exclude specific apps. **Describe the solution you'd like** `netbird-exclude` as a prefix command in order to launch any application outside of the mesh VPN. **Describe alternatives you've considered** Mullvad supports exit nodes and split tunneling but lacks mesh VPN capabilities. Tailscale offers exit nodes but doesn't support split tunneling. **Additional context** N/A
saavagebueno added the feature-requestclientroutes labels 2025-11-20 05:16:04 -05:00
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:16:04 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@tarunmittal24 commented on GitHub (Apr 23, 2024):

@lixmal are you guys working on this,

I thought my issue will get solved via exit node but it did not, as it only allows 0.0.0.0/0 traffic to flow via vpn peer, i want that only for a specific cidr range example [143.34.253.43/32] , my traffic will route via vpn, rest traffic should flow normal.

@tarunmittal24 commented on GitHub (Apr 23, 2024): @lixmal are you guys working on this, I thought my issue will get solved via **exit node** but it did not, as it only allows 0.0.0.0/0 traffic to flow via vpn peer, i want that only for a specific cidr range example [143.34.253.43/32] , my traffic will route via vpn, rest traffic should flow normal.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:16:04 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@tarunmittal24 commented on GitHub (Nov 12, 2024):

@mlsmaycon any updates on this ??

@tarunmittal24 commented on GitHub (Nov 12, 2024): @mlsmaycon any updates on this ??
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:16:05 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@simpsonnth commented on GitHub (Nov 13, 2024):

@tarunmittal24 I'm interest in this too! Especially since YouTube updated their service

@simpsonnth commented on GitHub (Nov 13, 2024): @tarunmittal24 I'm interest in this too! Especially since YouTube updated their service
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:16:05 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@tarunmittal24 commented on GitHub (Nov 13, 2024):

@tarunmittal24 I'm interest in this too! Especially since YouTube updated their service

Not Relevant, but can you share some insights of this YouTube updated their service, what it changed and how this can help

@tarunmittal24 commented on GitHub (Nov 13, 2024): > @tarunmittal24 I'm interest in this too! Especially since YouTube updated their service Not Relevant, but can you share some insights of this **YouTube updated their service**, what it changed and how this can help
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
2021 Q4
2022 Q1
2022 Q1
accessibility
acl
agent
agent
Android
Android
api
authentik
automation
azure
battery-usage
bug
cache
client
client-ui
cloud
cloud-only
cloudflare
community
compatibility
config-idp
config-issue
connection
contribution
coturn
cross-vpn
dashboard
data-usage
distribution
dns
docker
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
event-stream
feature-request
freebsd
getting-started
go
good first issue
gui
help wanted
home-assistant
idp
inconsistency
integration
integrations
ios
ipv6
jwt
k8s
keycloak
linux
login
macos
management-service
missing-docs
mobile
moved-internal
needs-review
netbird-ui
networking
new-platform
nginx
notification
okta
openwrt
packaging
peer-management
peer-management
peer-management
performance
postgres
posture-checks
psk
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
refactor
relay
release
rfc
routes
security
security-related
self-hosting
server
signal
sleep-issue
ssh
ssl
status
store
synology
system-compatibility-issue
test-suite
third-party-integration
triage
triage-needed
troubleshooting
UX
waiting-feedback
windows
wontfix
zitadel
No Label client feature-request routes
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
saavagebueno
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SVI/netbird#692
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?