SVI/netbird
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird.git synced 2026-05-10 18:22:12 -04:00
Code Issues 3.0k Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Add GPG signatures for RPM packages #699

New Issue
Open
opened 2025-11-20 05:16:09 -05:00 by saavagebueno · 1 comment
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:16:09 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @Darin755 on GitHub (Mar 13, 2024).

Describe the problem
When you use Gnome software it will complain that the RPM package isn't signed. This isn't the end of the world but it got me thinking about security and resistance to supply chain attacks. Having a GPG signed package should help to prevent a malicious update assuming that the key is properly protected.

To Reproduce

  1. Edit /etc/yum.repos.d/netbird.repo on Fedora to force GPG package checks.
  2. DNF can't continue as there isn't a GPG key

Expected behavior
There should be a GPG key for RPM packages that DNF can use to verify packages. Here is a brief article about it:
https://www.redhat.com/sysadmin/rpm-gpg-verify-packages

Are you using NetBird Cloud?
This shouldn't matter

NetBird version
Netbird 0.26.3

Originally created by @Darin755 on GitHub (Mar 13, 2024). **Describe the problem** When you use Gnome software it will complain that the RPM package isn't signed. This isn't the end of the world but it got me thinking about security and resistance to supply chain attacks. Having a GPG signed package should help to prevent a malicious update assuming that the key is properly protected. **To Reproduce** 1. Edit /etc/yum.repos.d/netbird.repo on Fedora to force GPG package checks. 2. DNF can't continue as there isn't a GPG key **Expected behavior** There should be a GPG key for RPM packages that DNF can use to verify packages. Here is a brief article about it: https://www.redhat.com/sysadmin/rpm-gpg-verify-packages **Are you using NetBird Cloud?** This shouldn't matter **NetBird version** Netbird 0.26.3
saavagebueno added the enhancementfeature-requestclientpackaging labels 2025-11-20 05:16:09 -05:00
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:16:10 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@pappz commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2024):

Hello @Darin755,
Thank you for the report. We will work on it!

@pappz commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2024): Hello @Darin755, Thank you for the report. We will work on it!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
2021 Q4
2022 Q1
2022 Q1
accessibility
acl
agent
agent
Android
Android
api
authentik
automation
azure
battery-usage
bug
cache
client
client-ui
cloud
cloud-only
cloudflare
community
compatibility
config-idp
config-issue
connection
contribution
coturn
cross-vpn
dashboard
data-usage
distribution
dns
docker
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
event-stream
feature-request
freebsd
getting-started
go
good first issue
gui
help wanted
home-assistant
idp
inconsistency
integration
integrations
ios
ipv6
jwt
k8s
keycloak
linux
login
macos
management-service
missing-docs
mobile
moved-internal
needs-review
netbird-ui
networking
new-platform
nginx
notification
okta
openwrt
packaging
peer-management
peer-management
peer-management
performance
postgres
posture-checks
psk
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
refactor
relay
release
rfc
routes
security
security-related
self-hosting
server
signal
sleep-issue
ssh
ssl
status
store
synology
system-compatibility-issue
test-suite
third-party-integration
triage
triage-needed
troubleshooting
UX
waiting-feedback
windows
wontfix
zitadel
No Label client enhancement feature-request packaging
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
saavagebueno
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SVI/netbird#699
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?