SVI/netbird
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird.git synced 2026-05-10 02:02:26 -04:00
Code Issues 3.0k Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Allow creation of multiple network ranges (CIDR) when creating new routes #701

New Issue
Open
opened 2025-11-20 05:16:13 -05:00 by saavagebueno · 5 comments
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:16:13 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @MrChenhtlss on GitHub (Mar 14, 2024).

Here is a great feature request or suggestion that I think is great

I think we can add a feature in the next version when we Create New Route When adding multiple Network Ranges at once, as shown in the following figure

IMG_3802

Originally created by @MrChenhtlss on GitHub (Mar 14, 2024). Here is a great feature request or suggestion that I think is great I think we can add a feature in the next version when we Create New Route When adding multiple Network Ranges at once, as shown in the following figure ![IMG_3802](https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/assets/146620104/56f22383-da81-4038-b92d-3fa44121b2e1)
saavagebueno added the feature-requestdashboard labels 2025-11-20 05:16:13 -05:00
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:16:13 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@mlsmaycon commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2024):

Hello @MrChenhtlss, based on the example you provided, the main requirement for this would be to configure more specific routes? We have network routes access controls coming soon and that could solve the problem.

@mlsmaycon commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2024): Hello @MrChenhtlss, based on the example you provided, the main requirement for this would be to configure more specific routes? We have network routes access controls coming soon and that could solve the problem.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:16:13 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@MrChenhtlss commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2024):

Maycon Santos @.***>于2024年3月15日 周五19:02写道：

Hello @MrChenhtlss https://github.com/MrChenhtlss, based on the example
you provided, the main requirement for this would be to configure more
specific routes? We have network routes access controls coming soon and
that could solve the problem.

—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/1707#issuecomment-1999418548,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BC6T5SDMC6E3CQ65GFL5QKTYYLILZAVCNFSM6AAAAABEXILKXSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSOJZGQYTQNJUHA
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
@.***>

For example, I have a Linux netbird client that
can be routed, 192.168.1.0/24 172.16.12.0/23Or more reachable routes can be
added uniformly, instead of having so many messy routing entries like now

@MrChenhtlss commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2024): Maycon Santos ***@***.***>于2024年3月15日 周五19:02写道： > Hello @MrChenhtlss <https://github.com/MrChenhtlss>, based on the example > you provided, the main requirement for this would be to configure more > specific routes? We have network routes access controls coming soon and > that could solve the problem. > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/issues/1707#issuecomment-1999418548>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BC6T5SDMC6E3CQ65GFL5QKTYYLILZAVCNFSM6AAAAABEXILKXSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSOJZGQYTQNJUHA> > . > You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: > ***@***.***> > For example, I have a Linux netbird client that can be routed, 192.168.1.0/24 172.16.12.0/23Or more reachable routes can be added uniformly, instead of having so many messy routing entries like now
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:16:13 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@MrChenhtlss commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2024):

Hello @MrChenhtlss, based on the example you provided, the main requirement for this would be to configure more specific routes? We have network routes access controls coming soon and that could solve the problem.

Or maybe I have a lot of routing entries that need to be routed through software peers. If so, I can only add one route at a time and need to come up with multiple network identifiers. This is very inconvenient.

@MrChenhtlss commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2024): > Hello @MrChenhtlss, based on the example you provided, the main requirement for this would be to configure more specific routes? We have network routes access controls coming soon and that could solve the problem. Or maybe I have a lot of routing entries that need to be routed through software peers. If so, I can only add one route at a time and need to come up with multiple network identifiers. This is very inconvenient.
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:16:14 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@MrChenhtlss commented on GitHub (Apr 16, 2024):

您好@MrChenhtlss，根据您提供的示例，主要要求是配置更具体的路线？我们即将推出网络路由访问控制，这可以解决这个问题。

Hello @MrChenhtlss, based on the example you provided, the main requirement for this would be to configure more specific routes? We have network routes access controls coming soon and that could solve the problem.
May I ask if there is a possibility of my proposal being implemented

@MrChenhtlss commented on GitHub (Apr 16, 2024): > 您好@MrChenhtlss，根据您提供的示例，主要要求是配置更具体的路线？我们即将推出网络路由访问控制，这可以解决这个问题。 > Hello @MrChenhtlss, based on the example you provided, the main requirement for this would be to configure more specific routes? We have network routes access controls coming soon and that could solve the problem. May I ask if there is a possibility of my proposal being implemented
saavagebueno commented 2025-11-20 05:16:14 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@V-E-O commented on GitHub (Jun 20, 2025):

@nazarewk new Networks feature seems do not resolve this case

Image

@V-E-O commented on GitHub (Jun 20, 2025): @nazarewk new Networks feature seems do not resolve this case ![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/68f81904-a729-4b44-a1af-0e67ed4f6d76)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
2021 Q4
2022 Q1
2022 Q1
accessibility
acl
agent
agent
Android
Android
api
authentik
automation
azure
battery-usage
bug
cache
client
client-ui
cloud
cloud-only
cloudflare
community
compatibility
config-idp
config-issue
connection
contribution
coturn
cross-vpn
dashboard
data-usage
distribution
dns
docker
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
enhancement
event-stream
feature-request
freebsd
getting-started
go
good first issue
gui
help wanted
home-assistant
idp
inconsistency
integration
integrations
ios
ipv6
jwt
k8s
keycloak
linux
login
macos
management-service
missing-docs
mobile
moved-internal
needs-review
netbird-ui
networking
new-platform
nginx
notification
okta
openwrt
packaging
peer-management
peer-management
peer-management
performance
postgres
posture-checks
psk
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
refactor
relay
release
rfc
routes
security
security-related
self-hosting
server
signal
sleep-issue
ssh
ssl
status
store
synology
system-compatibility-issue
test-suite
third-party-integration
triage
triage-needed
troubleshooting
UX
waiting-feedback
windows
wontfix
zitadel
No Label dashboard feature-request
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
saavagebueno
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SVI/netbird#701
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?